Commit 7fdd3c49 authored by Mark Rutland's avatar Mark Rutland Committed by Will Deacon

ARM: perf: make name of arm_pmu_type consistent

Commit f12482c9 ("ARM: 6974/1: pmu: refactor reservation") changed
{release,reserve}_pmu to take an enum arm_pmu_type as a parameter, but
inconsistently named the parameter `type' or `device'. It would be nice
if these were consistent.

This patch makes use of enum arm_pmu_type consistent, always using
`type'. Related printks are updated, explicitly mentioning `type' also.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
parent 49bef833
......@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct arm_pmu_platdata {
* encoded error on failure.
*/
extern struct platform_device *
reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device);
reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type);
/**
* release_pmu() - Relinquish control of the performance counters
......@@ -62,26 +62,26 @@ release_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type);
* the actual hardware initialisation.
*/
extern int
init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device);
init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type);
#else /* CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU */
#include <linux/err.h>
static inline struct platform_device *
reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device)
reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type)
{
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}
static inline int
release_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device)
release_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type)
{
return -ENODEV;
}
static inline int
init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device)
init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type)
{
return -ENODEV;
}
......
......@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static int __devinit pmu_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
{
if (type < 0 || type >= ARM_NUM_PMU_DEVICES) {
pr_warning("received registration request for unknown "
"device %d\n", type);
"PMU device type %d\n", type);
return -EINVAL;
}
......@@ -112,17 +112,17 @@ static int __init register_pmu_driver(void)
device_initcall(register_pmu_driver);
struct platform_device *
reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device)
reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type)
{
struct platform_device *pdev;
if (test_and_set_bit_lock(device, &pmu_lock)) {
if (test_and_set_bit_lock(type, &pmu_lock)) {
pdev = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
} else if (pmu_devices[device] == NULL) {
clear_bit_unlock(device, &pmu_lock);
} else if (pmu_devices[type] == NULL) {
clear_bit_unlock(type, &pmu_lock);
pdev = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
} else {
pdev = pmu_devices[device];
pdev = pmu_devices[type];
}
return pdev;
......@@ -130,11 +130,11 @@ reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reserve_pmu);
int
release_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device)
release_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type)
{
if (WARN_ON(!pmu_devices[device]))
if (WARN_ON(!pmu_devices[type]))
return -EINVAL;
clear_bit_unlock(device, &pmu_lock);
clear_bit_unlock(type, &pmu_lock);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(release_pmu);
......@@ -182,17 +182,17 @@ init_cpu_pmu(void)
}
int
init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device)
init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type)
{
int err = 0;
switch (device) {
switch (type) {
case ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU:
err = init_cpu_pmu();
break;
default:
pr_warning("attempt to initialise unknown device %d\n",
device);
pr_warning("attempt to initialise PMU of unknown "
"type %d\n", type);
err = -EINVAL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment