perf tools: Fix spelling mistake "parametrized" -> "parameterized"

There are spelling mistakes in comments and a pr_debug message. Fix them.
Reviewed-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231003074911.220216-1-colin.i.king@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c

@@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ static int test__pmu_events(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
 			if (strchr(ent->d_name, '.'))
 				continue;
 
-			/* exclude parametrized ones (name contains '?') */
+			/* exclude parameterized ones (name contains '?') */
 			n = snprintf(pmu_event, sizeof(pmu_event), "%s%s", path, ent->d_name);
 			if (n >= PATH_MAX) {
 				pr_err("pmu event name crossed PATH_MAX(%d) size\n", PATH_MAX);
@@ -2578,7 +2578,7 @@ static int test__pmu_events(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
 			fclose(file);
 
 			if (is_event_parameterized == 1) {
-				pr_debug("skipping parametrized PMU event: %s which contains ?\n", pmu_event);
+				pr_debug("skipping parameterized PMU event: %s which contains ?\n", pmu_event);
 				continue;
 			}
 

tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 set -e
 
-# Test all PMU events; however exclude parametrized ones (name contains '?')
+# Test all PMU events; however exclude parameterized ones (name contains '?')
 for p in $(perf list --raw-dump pmu | sed 's/[[:graph:]]\+?[[:graph:]]\+[[:space:]]//g'); do
   echo "Testing $p"
   result=$(perf stat -e "$p" true 2>&1)