RISC-V: resort all extensions in consistent orders
Ordering between each and every list of extensions is wildly inconsistent. Per discussion on the lists pick the following policy: - The array defining order in /proc/cpuinfo follows a narrow interpretation of the ISA specifications, described in a comment immediately presiding it. - All other lists of extensions are sorted alphabetically. This will hopefully allow for easier review & future additions, and reduce conflicts between patchsets as the number of extensions grows. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221129144742.2935581-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com/Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221205144525.2148448-3-conor.dooley@microchip.comSigned-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment