Commit 81459350 authored by Jens Axboe's avatar Jens Axboe

io_uring: cache req->apoll->events in req->cflags

When we arm poll on behalf of a different type of request, like a network
receive, then we allocate req->apoll as our poll entry. Running network
workloads shows io_poll_check_events() as the most expensive part of
io_uring, and it's all due to having to pull in req->apoll instead of
just the request which we have hot already.

Cache poll->events in req->cflags, which isn't used until the request
completes anyway. This isn't strictly needed for regular poll, where
req->poll.events is used and thus already hot, but for the sake of
unification we do it all around.

This saves 3-4% of overhead in certain request workloads.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 521d61fc
......@@ -5876,13 +5876,13 @@ static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req)
return -ECANCELED;
if (!req->result) {
struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = poll->events };
struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = req->cflags };
req->result = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & poll->events;
req->result = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & req->cflags;
}
/* multishot, just fill an CQE and proceed */
if (req->result && !(poll->events & EPOLLONESHOT)) {
if (req->result && !(req->cflags & EPOLLONESHOT)) {
__poll_t mask = mangle_poll(req->result & poll->events);
bool filled;
......@@ -5953,9 +5953,16 @@ static void io_apoll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
io_req_complete_failed(req, ret);
}
static void __io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int mask)
static void __io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int mask, int events)
{
req->result = mask;
/*
* This is useful for poll that is armed on behalf of another
* request, and where the wakeup path could be on a different
* CPU. We want to avoid pulling in req->apoll->events for that
* case.
*/
req->cflags = events;
if (req->opcode == IORING_OP_POLL_ADD)
req->io_task_work.func = io_poll_task_func;
else
......@@ -5965,17 +5972,17 @@ static void __io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int mask)
io_req_task_work_add(req, false);
}
static inline void io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int res)
static inline void io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int res, int events)
{
if (io_poll_get_ownership(req))
__io_poll_execute(req, res);
__io_poll_execute(req, res, events);
}
static void io_poll_cancel_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
io_poll_mark_cancelled(req);
/* kick tw, which should complete the request */
io_poll_execute(req, 0);
io_poll_execute(req, 0, 0);
}
static int io_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
......@@ -5989,7 +5996,7 @@ static int io_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
if (unlikely(mask & POLLFREE)) {
io_poll_mark_cancelled(req);
/* we have to kick tw in case it's not already */
io_poll_execute(req, 0);
io_poll_execute(req, 0, poll->events);
/*
* If the waitqueue is being freed early but someone is already
......@@ -6020,7 +6027,7 @@ static int io_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
list_del_init(&poll->wait.entry);
poll->head = NULL;
}
__io_poll_execute(req, mask);
__io_poll_execute(req, mask, poll->events);
}
return 1;
}
......@@ -6124,7 +6131,7 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
/* can't multishot if failed, just queue the event we've got */
if (unlikely(ipt->error || !ipt->nr_entries))
poll->events |= EPOLLONESHOT;
__io_poll_execute(req, mask);
__io_poll_execute(req, mask, poll->events);
return 0;
}
io_add_napi(req->file, req->ctx);
......@@ -6135,7 +6142,7 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
*/
v = atomic_dec_return(&req->poll_refs);
if (unlikely(v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK))
__io_poll_execute(req, 0);
__io_poll_execute(req, 0, poll->events);
return 0;
}
......@@ -6333,7 +6340,7 @@ static int io_poll_add_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe
return -EINVAL;
io_req_set_refcount(req);
poll->events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
req->cflags = poll->events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment