io_uring: drop sqd lock before handling signals for SQPOLL
Don't call into get_signal() with the sqd mutex held, it'll fail if we're freezing the task and we'll get complaints on locks still being held: ==================================== WARNING: iou-sqp-8386/8387 still has locks held! 5.12.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------ 1 lock held by iou-sqp-8386/8387: #0: ffff88801e1d2470 (&sqd->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_sq_thread+0x24c/0x13a0 fs/io_uring.c:6731 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 8387 Comm: iou-sqp-8386 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline] dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120 try_to_freeze include/linux/freezer.h:66 [inline] get_signal+0x171a/0x2150 kernel/signal.c:2576 io_sq_thread+0x8d2/0x13a0 fs/io_uring.c:6748 Fold the get_signal() case in with the parking checks, as we need to drop the lock in both cases, and since we need to be checking for parking when juggling the lock anyway. Reported-by: syzbot+796d767eb376810256f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: dbe1bdbb ("io_uring: handle signals for IO threads like a normal thread") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment