Commit 827ed2b0 authored by Christian König's avatar Christian König Committed by Alex Deucher

drm/ttm: use try_lock in ttm_bo_delayed_delete again

We only need to wait for the contended lock when the reservation object is
shared or when we want to remove everything. A trylock should be sufficient
in all other cases.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRoger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent 3b1186fd
......@@ -586,12 +586,17 @@ static bool ttm_bo_delayed_delete(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, bool remove_all)
ddestroy);
kref_get(&bo->list_kref);
list_move_tail(&bo->ddestroy, &removed);
spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
reservation_object_lock(bo->resv, NULL);
if (remove_all || bo->resv != &bo->ttm_resv) {
spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
reservation_object_lock(bo->resv, NULL);
spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, false, !remove_all, true);
spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, false, !remove_all, true);
} else if (reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv)) {
ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, false, !remove_all, true);
}
kref_put(&bo->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list);
spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment