9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC
[ Upstream commit a84b69cb ] If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must* issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused the same tag. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.2 and later Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment