Commit 86247aba authored by Benjamin Poirier's avatar Benjamin Poirier Committed by David S. Miller

net: bonding: Unsync device addresses on ndo_stop

Netdev drivers are expected to call dev_{uc,mc}_sync() in their
ndo_set_rx_mode method and dev_{uc,mc}_unsync() in their ndo_stop method.
This is mentioned in the kerneldoc for those dev_* functions.

The bonding driver calls dev_{uc,mc}_unsync() during ndo_uninit instead of
ndo_stop. This is ineffective because address lists (dev->{uc,mc}) have
already been emptied in unregister_netdevice_many() before ndo_uninit is
called. This mistake can result in addresses being leftover on former bond
slaves after a bond has been deleted; see test_LAG_cleanup() in the last
patch in this series.

Add unsync calls, via bond_hw_addr_flush(), at their expected location,
bond_close().
Add dev_mc_add() call to bond_open() to match the above change.

v3:
* When adding or deleting a slave, only sync/unsync, add/del addresses if
  the bond is up. In other cases, it is taken care of at the right time by
  ndo_open/ndo_set_rx_mode/ndo_stop.

Fixes: 1da177e4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 1d9a143e
......@@ -886,7 +886,8 @@ static void bond_hw_addr_swap(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_active,
if (bond->dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI)
dev_set_allmulti(old_active->dev, -1);
bond_hw_addr_flush(bond->dev, old_active->dev);
if (bond->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
bond_hw_addr_flush(bond->dev, old_active->dev);
}
if (new_active) {
......@@ -897,10 +898,12 @@ static void bond_hw_addr_swap(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_active,
if (bond->dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI)
dev_set_allmulti(new_active->dev, 1);
netif_addr_lock_bh(bond->dev);
dev_uc_sync(new_active->dev, bond->dev);
dev_mc_sync(new_active->dev, bond->dev);
netif_addr_unlock_bh(bond->dev);
if (bond->dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
netif_addr_lock_bh(bond->dev);
dev_uc_sync(new_active->dev, bond->dev);
dev_mc_sync(new_active->dev, bond->dev);
netif_addr_unlock_bh(bond->dev);
}
}
}
......@@ -2162,13 +2165,15 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev,
}
}
netif_addr_lock_bh(bond_dev);
dev_mc_sync_multiple(slave_dev, bond_dev);
dev_uc_sync_multiple(slave_dev, bond_dev);
netif_addr_unlock_bh(bond_dev);
if (bond_dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
netif_addr_lock_bh(bond_dev);
dev_mc_sync_multiple(slave_dev, bond_dev);
dev_uc_sync_multiple(slave_dev, bond_dev);
netif_addr_unlock_bh(bond_dev);
if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
dev_mc_add(slave_dev, lacpdu_mcast_addr);
if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
dev_mc_add(slave_dev, lacpdu_mcast_addr);
}
}
bond->slave_cnt++;
......@@ -2439,7 +2444,8 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
if (old_flags & IFF_ALLMULTI)
dev_set_allmulti(slave_dev, -1);
bond_hw_addr_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev);
if (old_flags & IFF_UP)
bond_hw_addr_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev);
}
slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
......@@ -4213,6 +4219,9 @@ static int bond_open(struct net_device *bond_dev)
/* register to receive LACPDUs */
bond->recv_probe = bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv;
bond_3ad_initiate_agg_selection(bond, 1);
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
dev_mc_add(slave->dev, lacpdu_mcast_addr);
}
if (bond_mode_can_use_xmit_hash(bond))
......@@ -4224,6 +4233,7 @@ static int bond_open(struct net_device *bond_dev)
static int bond_close(struct net_device *bond_dev)
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
struct slave *slave;
bond_work_cancel_all(bond);
bond->send_peer_notif = 0;
......@@ -4231,6 +4241,19 @@ static int bond_close(struct net_device *bond_dev)
bond_alb_deinitialize(bond);
bond->recv_probe = NULL;
if (bond_uses_primary(bond)) {
rcu_read_lock();
slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
if (slave)
bond_hw_addr_flush(bond_dev, slave->dev);
rcu_read_unlock();
} else {
struct list_head *iter;
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
bond_hw_addr_flush(bond_dev, slave->dev);
}
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment