Commit 8651be8f authored by WANG Cong's avatar WANG Cong Committed by David S. Miller

ipv6: fix a potential deadlock in do_ipv6_setsockopt()

Baozeng reported this deadlock case:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock([  165.136033] sk_lock-AF_INET6);
                               lock([  165.136033] rtnl_mutex);
                               lock([  165.136033] sk_lock-AF_INET6);
  lock([  165.136033] rtnl_mutex);

Similar to commit 87e9f031
("ipv4: fix a potential deadlock in mcast getsockopt() path")
this is due to we still have a case, ipv6_sock_mc_close(),
where we acquire sk_lock before rtnl_lock. Close this deadlock
with the similar solution, that is always acquire rtnl lock first.

Fixes: baf606d9 ("ipv4,ipv6: grab rtnl before locking the socket")
Reported-by: default avatarBaozeng Ding <sploving1@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarBaozeng Ding <sploving1@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 8dbad1a8
......@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
const struct in6_addr *addr);
int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
const struct in6_addr *addr);
void __ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk);
void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk);
bool inet6_mc_check(struct sock *sk, const struct in6_addr *mc_addr,
const struct in6_addr *src_addr);
......
......@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ struct ipv6_txoptions *ipv6_update_options(struct sock *sk,
static bool setsockopt_needs_rtnl(int optname)
{
switch (optname) {
case IPV6_ADDRFORM:
case IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP:
case IPV6_DROP_MEMBERSHIP:
case IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST:
......@@ -198,7 +199,7 @@ static int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
}
fl6_free_socklist(sk);
ipv6_sock_mc_close(sk);
__ipv6_sock_mc_close(sk);
/*
* Sock is moving from IPv6 to IPv4 (sk_prot), so
......
......@@ -276,16 +276,14 @@ static struct inet6_dev *ip6_mc_find_dev_rcu(struct net *net,
return idev;
}
void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
void __ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
{
struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
struct ipv6_mc_socklist *mc_lst;
struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
if (!rcu_access_pointer(np->ipv6_mc_list))
return;
ASSERT_RTNL();
rtnl_lock();
while ((mc_lst = rtnl_dereference(np->ipv6_mc_list)) != NULL) {
struct net_device *dev;
......@@ -303,8 +301,17 @@ void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
atomic_sub(sizeof(*mc_lst), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
kfree_rcu(mc_lst, rcu);
}
}
void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
{
struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
if (!rcu_access_pointer(np->ipv6_mc_list))
return;
rtnl_lock();
__ipv6_sock_mc_close(sk);
rtnl_unlock();
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment