drm/qxl: use iterator instead of dma_resv_shared_list
I'm not sure why it is useful to know the number of fences in the reservation object, but we try to avoid exposing the dma_resv_shared_list() function. So use the iterator instead. If more information is desired we could use dma_resv_describe() as well. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211129120659.1815-5-christian.koenig@amd.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment