Commit 86d4d068 authored by John David Anglin's avatar John David Anglin Committed by Helge Deller

parisc: Revert "Release spinlocks using ordered store"

This reverts commit d27dfa13.

Unfortunately, this patch needs to be reverted.  We need the full sync
barrier and not the limited barrier provided by using an ordered store.
The sync ensures that all accesses and cache purge instructions that
follow the sync are performed after all such instructions prior the sync
instruction have completed executing.

The patch breaks the rwlock implementation in glibc.  This caused the
test-lock application in the libprelude testsuite to hang.  With the
change reverted, the test runs correctly and the libprelude package
builds successfully.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
parent 65102238
......@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *x)
volatile unsigned int *a;
a = __ldcw_align(x);
/* Release with ordered store. */
__asm__ __volatile__("stw,ma %0,0(%1)" : : "r"(1), "r"(a) : "memory");
mb();
*a = 1;
}
static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *x)
......
......@@ -640,7 +640,8 @@ cas_action:
sub,<> %r28, %r25, %r0
2: stw %r24, 0(%r26)
/* Free lock */
stw,ma %r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
sync
stw %r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
#if ENABLE_LWS_DEBUG
/* Clear thread register indicator */
stw %r0, 4(%sr2,%r20)
......@@ -654,7 +655,8 @@ cas_action:
3:
/* Error occurred on load or store */
/* Free lock */
stw,ma %r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
sync
stw %r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
#if ENABLE_LWS_DEBUG
stw %r0, 4(%sr2,%r20)
#endif
......@@ -855,7 +857,8 @@ cas2_action:
cas2_end:
/* Free lock */
stw,ma %r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
sync
stw %r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
/* Enable interrupts */
ssm PSW_SM_I, %r0
/* Return to userspace, set no error */
......@@ -865,7 +868,8 @@ cas2_end:
22:
/* Error occurred on load or store */
/* Free lock */
stw,ma %r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
sync
stw %r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
ssm PSW_SM_I, %r0
ldo 1(%r0),%r28
b lws_exit
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment