bpftool: Always disable stack protection for BPF objects
When the clang toolchain has stack protection enabled in order to be consistent with gcc - which just happens to be the case on Gentoo - the bpftool build fails: [...] clang \ -I. \ -I/tmp/portage/dev-util/bpftool-6.0.12/work/linux-6.0/tools/include/uapi/ \ -I/tmp/portage/dev-util/bpftool-6.0.12/work/linux-6.0/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/libbpf/include \ -g -O2 -Wall -target bpf -c skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c -o pid_iter.bpf.o clang \ -I. \ -I/tmp/portage/dev-util/bpftool-6.0.12/work/linux-6.0/tools/include/uapi/ \ -I/tmp/portage/dev-util/bpftool-6.0.12/work/linux-6.0/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/libbpf/include \ -g -O2 -Wall -target bpf -c skeleton/profiler.bpf.c -o profiler.bpf.o skeleton/profiler.bpf.c:40:14: error: A call to built-in function '__stack_chk_fail' is not supported. int BPF_PROG(fentry_XXX) ^ skeleton/profiler.bpf.c:94:14: error: A call to built-in function '__stack_chk_fail' is not supported. int BPF_PROG(fexit_XXX) ^ 2 errors generated. [...] Since stack-protector makes no sense for the BPF bits just unconditionally disable it. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/890638Signed-off-by:Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> Signed-off-by:
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by:
Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/74cd9d2e-6052-312a-241e-2b514a75c92c@applied-asynchrony.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment