Commit 884ac297 authored by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk's avatar Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

xen/pci: We don't do multiple MSI's.

There is no hypercall to setup multiple MSI per PCI device.
As such with these two new commits:
-  08261d87
   PCI/MSI: Enable multiple MSIs with pci_enable_msi_block_auto()
- 5ca72c4f
   AHCI: Support multiple MSIs

we would call the PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq 'nvec' times with the same
contents of the PCI device. Sander discovered that we would get
the same PIRQ value 'nvec' times and return said values to the
caller. That of course meant that the device was configured only
with one MSI and AHCI would fail with:

ahci 0000:00:11.0: version 3.0
xen: registering gsi 19 triggering 0 polarity 1
xen: --> pirq=19 -> irq=19 (gsi=19)
(XEN) [2013-02-27 19:43:07] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-19 -> 0x99 -> IRQ 19 Mode:1 Active:1)
ahci 0000:00:11.0: AHCI 0001.0200 32 slots 4 ports 6 Gbps 0xf impl SATA mode
ahci 0000:00:11.0: flags: 64bit ncq sntf ilck pm led clo pmp pio slum part
ahci: probe of 0000:00:11.0 failed with error -22

That is b/c in ahci_host_activate the second call to
devm_request_threaded_irq  would return -EINVAL as we passed in
(on the second run) an IRQ that was never initialized.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-and-Tested-by: default avatarSander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
parent c79c4982
...@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static int xen_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) ...@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static int xen_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
struct msi_desc *msidesc; struct msi_desc *msidesc;
int *v; int *v;
if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
return 1;
v = kzalloc(sizeof(int) * max(1, nvec), GFP_KERNEL); v = kzalloc(sizeof(int) * max(1, nvec), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!v) if (!v)
return -ENOMEM; return -ENOMEM;
...@@ -220,6 +223,9 @@ static int xen_hvm_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) ...@@ -220,6 +223,9 @@ static int xen_hvm_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
struct msi_desc *msidesc; struct msi_desc *msidesc;
struct msi_msg msg; struct msi_msg msg;
if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
return 1;
list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) { list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
__read_msi_msg(msidesc, &msg); __read_msi_msg(msidesc, &msg);
pirq = MSI_ADDR_EXT_DEST_ID(msg.address_hi) | pirq = MSI_ADDR_EXT_DEST_ID(msg.address_hi) |
...@@ -263,6 +269,9 @@ static int xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) ...@@ -263,6 +269,9 @@ static int xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
int ret = 0; int ret = 0;
struct msi_desc *msidesc; struct msi_desc *msidesc;
if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
return 1;
list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) { list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
struct physdev_map_pirq map_irq; struct physdev_map_pirq map_irq;
domid_t domid; domid_t domid;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment