Commit 8a41dfcd authored by Vincent Guittot's avatar Vincent Guittot Committed by Peter Zijlstra

sched/fair: Don't set LBF_ALL_PINNED unnecessarily

Setting LBF_ALL_PINNED during active load balance is only valid when there
is only 1 running task on the rq otherwise this ends up increasing the
balance interval whereas other tasks could migrate after the next interval
once they become cache-cold as an example.

LBF_ALL_PINNED flag is now always set it by default. It is then cleared
when we find one task that can be pulled when calling detach_tasks() or
during active migration.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107103325.30851-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
parent fc488ffd
......@@ -9639,6 +9639,8 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
env.src_rq = busiest;
ld_moved = 0;
/* Clear this flag as soon as we find a pullable task */
env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
if (busiest->nr_running > 1) {
/*
* Attempt to move tasks. If find_busiest_group has found
......@@ -9646,7 +9648,6 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
* still unbalanced. ld_moved simply stays zero, so it is
* correctly treated as an imbalance.
*/
env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
env.loop_max = min(sysctl_sched_nr_migrate, busiest->nr_running);
more_balance:
......@@ -9772,10 +9773,12 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, busiest->curr->cpus_ptr)) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&busiest->lock,
flags);
env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
goto out_one_pinned;
}
/* Record that we found at least one task that could run on this_cpu */
env.flags &= ~LBF_ALL_PINNED;
/*
* ->active_balance synchronizes accesses to
* ->active_balance_work. Once set, it's cleared
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment