Commit 8b5f0010 authored by Jisheng Zhang's avatar Jisheng Zhang Committed by Daniel Lezcano

clockevents/drivers/dw_apb_timer: Add dynamic irq flag to the timer

Commit d2348fb6 ("tick: Dynamically set broadcast irq affinity")
adds one excellent feature CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ to let the core set the
interrupt affinity of the broadcast interrupt to the cpu which has the
earliest expiry time. This patch adds CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ flag to
avoid unnecessary wakeups and IPIs when the dw_apb_timer is used as
broadcast timer.

A simple test:
~ # rm /tmp/test.sh
~ # cat > /tmp/test.sh
cat /proc/interrupts
for i in `seq 10` ; do sleep $i; done
cat /proc/interrupts
~ # chmod +x /tmp/test.sh
~ # taskset 0x2 /tmp/test.sh

without the patch:

           CPU0       CPU1
 27:        115         36       GIC  27  arch_timer
 45:         62          0       GIC  45  mmc0
160:         88          0  interrupt-controller   8  timer
227:          0          0  interrupt-controller   4  f7e81400.i2c
228:          0          0  interrupt-controller   5  f7e81800.i2c
229:          0          0  interrupt-controller   7  dw_spi65535
230:          0          0  interrupt-controller  21  f7e84000.i2c
231:          0          0  interrupt-controller  20  f7e84800.i2c
265:        445          0  interrupt-controller   8  serial
IPI0:          0          0  CPU wakeup interrupts
IPI1:          0         11  Timer broadcast interrupts
IPI2:         56        104  Rescheduling interrupts
IPI3:          0          0  Function call interrupts
IPI4:          0          4  Single function call interrupts
IPI5:          0          0  CPU stop interrupts
IPI6:         25         27  IRQ work interrupts
IPI7:          0          0  completion interrupts
IPI8:          0          0  CPU backtrace
Err:          0
           CPU0       CPU1
 27:        115         38       GIC  27  arch_timer
 45:         62          0       GIC  45  mmc0
160:        160          0  interrupt-controller   8  timer
227:          0          0  interrupt-controller   4  f7e81400.i2c
228:          0          0  interrupt-controller   5  f7e81800.i2c
229:          0          0  interrupt-controller   7  dw_spi65535
230:          0          0  interrupt-controller  21  f7e84000.i2c
231:          0          0  interrupt-controller  20  f7e84800.i2c
265:        514          0  interrupt-controller   8  serial
IPI0:          0          0  CPU wakeup interrupts
IPI1:          0         83  Timer broadcast interrupts
IPI2:         56        104  Rescheduling interrupts
IPI3:          0          0  Function call interrupts
IPI4:          0          4  Single function call interrupts
IPI5:          0          0  CPU stop interrupts
IPI6:         25         46  IRQ work interrupts
IPI7:          0          0  completion interrupts
IPI8:          0          0  CPU backtrace
Err:          0

cpu0 get 160-88=72 timer interrupts, CPU1 got 83-11=72 broadcast timer
IPIs
So, overall system got 72+72=144 wake ups and 72 broadcast timer IPIs

With the patch:
           CPU0       CPU1
 27:        107         37       GIC  27  arch_timer
 45:         62          0       GIC  45  mmc0
160:         66          7  interrupt-controller   8  timer
227:          0          0  interrupt-controller   4  f7e81400.i2c
228:          0          0  interrupt-controller   5  f7e81800.i2c
229:          0          0  interrupt-controller   7  dw_spi65535
230:          0          0  interrupt-controller  21  f7e84000.i2c
231:          0          0  interrupt-controller  20  f7e84800.i2c
265:        311          0  interrupt-controller   8  serial
IPI0:          0          0  CPU wakeup interrupts
IPI1:          2          4  Timer broadcast interrupts
IPI2:         58        100  Rescheduling interrupts
IPI3:          0          0  Function call interrupts
IPI4:          0          4  Single function call interrupts
IPI5:          0          0  CPU stop interrupts
IPI6:         21         24  IRQ work interrupts
IPI7:          0          0  completion interrupts
IPI8:          0          0  CPU backtrace
Err:          0
           CPU0       CPU1
 27:        107         39       GIC  27  arch_timer
 45:         62          0       GIC  45  mmc0
160:         69         75  interrupt-controller   8  timer
227:          0          0  interrupt-controller   4  f7e81400.i2c
228:          0          0  interrupt-controller   5  f7e81800.i2c
229:          0          0  interrupt-controller   7  dw_spi65535
230:          0          0  interrupt-controller  21  f7e84000.i2c
231:          0          0  interrupt-controller  20  f7e84800.i2c
265:        380          0  interrupt-controller   8  serial
IPI0:          0          0  CPU wakeup interrupts
IPI1:          3          6  Timer broadcast interrupts
IPI2:         60        100  Rescheduling interrupts
IPI3:          0          0  Function call interrupts
IPI4:          0          4  Single function call interrupts
IPI5:          0          0  CPU stop interrupts
IPI6:         21         45  IRQ work interrupts
IPI7:          0          0  completion interrupts
IPI8:          0          0  CPU backtrace
Err:          0

cpu0 got 69-66=3, cpu1 got 75-7=68 timer interrupts. cpu0 got 3-2=1
broadcast timer IPIs, cpu1 got 6-4=2 broadcast timer IPIs.
So, overall system got 3+68+1+2=74 wakeups and 1+2=3 broadcast timer
IPIs

This patch removes 50% wakeups and almost 100% broadcast timer IPIs!
Signed-off-by: default avatarJisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
parent 79e436d3
......@@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ dw_apb_clockevent_init(int cpu, const char *name, unsigned rating,
&dw_ced->ced);
dw_ced->ced.min_delta_ns = clockevent_delta2ns(5000, &dw_ced->ced);
dw_ced->ced.cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
dw_ced->ced.features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
dw_ced->ced.features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC |
CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ;
dw_ced->ced.set_state_shutdown = apbt_shutdown;
dw_ced->ced.set_state_periodic = apbt_set_periodic;
dw_ced->ced.set_state_oneshot = apbt_set_oneshot;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment