Commit 8bf6c677 authored by Sebastian Siewior's avatar Sebastian Siewior Committed by Peter Zijlstra

completion: Use lockdep_assert_RT_in_threaded_ctx() in complete_all()

The warning was intended to spot complete_all() users from hardirq
context on PREEMPT_RT. The warning as-is will also trigger in interrupt
handlers, which are threaded on PREEMPT_RT, which was not intended.

Use lockdep_assert_RT_in_threaded_ctx() which triggers in non-preemptive
context on PREEMPT_RT.

Fixes: a5c6234e ("completion: Use simple wait queues")
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200323152019.4qjwluldohuh3by5@linutronix.de
parent d53f2b62
......@@ -711,6 +711,21 @@ do { \
# define lockdep_assert_in_irq() do { } while (0)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
# define lockdep_assert_RT_in_threaded_ctx() do { \
WARN_ONCE(debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion && \
current->hardirq_context && \
!(current->hardirq_threaded || current->irq_config), \
"Not in threaded context on PREEMPT_RT as expected\n"); \
} while (0)
#else
# define lockdep_assert_RT_in_threaded_ctx() do { } while (0)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s);
#else
......
......@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ void complete_all(struct completion *x)
{
unsigned long flags;
WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
lockdep_assert_RT_in_threaded_ctx();
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
x->done = UINT_MAX;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment