Commit 8d23f4ba authored by Vasu Dev's avatar Vasu Dev Committed by James Bottomley

[SCSI] libfc: don't call resp handler after FC_EX_TIMEOUT

In cases exch is already timed out then exch layer could
end up calling resp handler again for its response frame
received after timeout, though in this case fc_exch_timeout
handler would have already called resp with FC_EX_TIMEOUT.

This would cause REC response handler to release its
fsp pkt hold twice instead once and possibly similar issues
with other ELS exchanges in this race.

To avoid this race have resp updated under exch lock
in rx path, the resp would get set to NULL in case
of FC_EX_TIMEOUT under the same lock to prevent resp
callback after FC_EX_TIMEOUT.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarRoss Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRobert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJames Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
parent 6a716a85
...@@ -1434,6 +1434,7 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, struct fc_frame *fp) ...@@ -1434,6 +1434,7 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, struct fc_frame *fp)
(f_ctl & (FC_FC_LAST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ)) == (f_ctl & (FC_FC_LAST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ)) ==
(FC_FC_LAST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ)) { (FC_FC_LAST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ)) {
spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock); spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
resp = ep->resp;
rc = fc_exch_done_locked(ep); rc = fc_exch_done_locked(ep);
WARN_ON(fc_seq_exch(sp) != ep); WARN_ON(fc_seq_exch(sp) != ep);
spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock); spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment