Commit 8d2f518c authored by Michal Swiatkowski's avatar Michal Swiatkowski Committed by Tony Nguyen

ice: move devlink locking outside the port creation

In case of subfunction lock will be taken for whole port creation and
removing. Do the same in VF case.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSimon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Tested-by: default avatarSujai Buvaneswaran <sujai.buvaneswaran@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
parent 639ac8ce
......@@ -794,10 +794,8 @@ int ice_devlink_rate_init_tx_topology(struct devlink *devlink, struct ice_vsi *v
tc_node = pi->root->children[0];
mutex_lock(&pi->sched_lock);
devl_lock(devlink);
for (i = 0; i < tc_node->num_children; i++)
ice_traverse_tx_tree(devlink, tc_node->children[i], tc_node, pf);
devl_unlock(devlink);
mutex_unlock(&pi->sched_lock);
return 0;
......
......@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ int ice_devlink_create_vf_port(struct ice_vf *vf)
devlink_port_attrs_set(devlink_port, &attrs);
devlink = priv_to_devlink(pf);
err = devlink_port_register(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx);
err = devl_port_register(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx);
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to create devlink port for VF %d, error %d\n",
vf->vf_id, err);
......@@ -426,5 +426,5 @@ int ice_devlink_create_vf_port(struct ice_vf *vf)
void ice_devlink_destroy_vf_port(struct ice_vf *vf)
{
devl_rate_leaf_destroy(&vf->devlink_port);
devlink_port_unregister(&vf->devlink_port);
devl_port_unregister(&vf->devlink_port);
}
......@@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ static void ice_eswitch_start_reprs(struct ice_pf *pf)
int
ice_eswitch_attach(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_vf *vf)
{
struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(pf);
struct ice_repr *repr;
int err;
......@@ -437,7 +438,9 @@ ice_eswitch_attach(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_vf *vf)
ice_eswitch_stop_reprs(pf);
devl_lock(devlink);
repr = ice_repr_add_vf(vf);
devl_unlock(devlink);
if (IS_ERR(repr)) {
err = PTR_ERR(repr);
goto err_create_repr;
......@@ -460,7 +463,9 @@ ice_eswitch_attach(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_vf *vf)
err_xa_alloc:
ice_eswitch_release_repr(pf, repr);
err_setup_repr:
devl_lock(devlink);
ice_repr_rem_vf(repr);
devl_unlock(devlink);
err_create_repr:
if (xa_empty(&pf->eswitch.reprs))
ice_eswitch_disable_switchdev(pf);
......@@ -484,6 +489,7 @@ void ice_eswitch_detach(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_vf *vf)
ice_eswitch_disable_switchdev(pf);
ice_eswitch_release_repr(pf, repr);
devl_lock(devlink);
ice_repr_rem_vf(repr);
if (xa_empty(&pf->eswitch.reprs)) {
......@@ -491,12 +497,11 @@ void ice_eswitch_detach(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ice_vf *vf)
* no point in keeping the nodes
*/
ice_devlink_rate_clear_tx_topology(ice_get_main_vsi(pf));
devl_lock(devlink);
devl_rate_nodes_destroy(devlink);
devl_unlock(devlink);
} else {
ice_eswitch_start_reprs(pf);
}
devl_unlock(devlink);
}
/**
......
......@@ -285,9 +285,7 @@ ice_repr_reg_netdev(struct net_device *netdev)
static void ice_repr_remove_node(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
{
devl_lock(devlink_port->devlink);
devl_rate_leaf_destroy(devlink_port);
devl_unlock(devlink_port->devlink);
}
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment