Commit 8f28e8fa authored by Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso's avatar Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

After porting this fixlet to UML:

http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@41791ab52lfMuF2i3V-eTIGRBbDYKQ

, I've also added a warning which should refuse compilation with insane values
for PREEMPT_ACTIVE...  maybe we should simply move PREEMPT_ACTIVE out of
architectures using GENERIC_IRQS.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 37053cc8
......@@ -43,13 +43,17 @@
#define __IRQ_MASK(x) ((1UL << (x))-1)
#define PREEMPT_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(PREEMPT_BITS) << PREEMPT_SHIFT)
#define HARDIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(HARDIRQ_BITS) << HARDIRQ_SHIFT)
#define SOFTIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(SOFTIRQ_BITS) << SOFTIRQ_SHIFT)
#define HARDIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(HARDIRQ_BITS) << HARDIRQ_SHIFT)
#define PREEMPT_OFFSET (1UL << PREEMPT_SHIFT)
#define SOFTIRQ_OFFSET (1UL << SOFTIRQ_SHIFT)
#define HARDIRQ_OFFSET (1UL << HARDIRQ_SHIFT)
#if PREEMPT_ACTIVE < (1 << (HARDIRQ_SHIFT + HARDIRQ_BITS))
#error PREEMPT_ACTIVE is too low!
#endif
#define hardirq_count() (preempt_count() & HARDIRQ_MASK)
#define softirq_count() (preempt_count() & SOFTIRQ_MASK)
#define irq_count() (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment