Commit 8f3631f0 authored by Wander Lairson Costa's avatar Wander Lairson Costa Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

serial/8250: Use fifo in 8250 console driver

Note: I am using a small test app + driver located at [0] for the
problem description. serco is a driver whose write function dispatches
to the serial controller. sertest is a user-mode app that writes n bytes
to the serial console using the serco driver.

While investigating a bug in the RHEL kernel, I noticed that the serial
console throughput is way below the configured speed of 115200 bps in
a HP Proliant DL380 Gen9. I was expecting something above 10KB/s, but
I got 2.5KB/s.

$ time ./sertest -n 2500 /tmp/serco

real    0m0.997s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.997s

With the help of the function tracer, I then noticed the serial
controller was taking around 410us seconds to dispatch one single byte:

$ trace-cmd record -p function_graph -g serial8250_console_write \
   ./sertest -n 1 /tmp/serco

$ trace-cmd report

            |  serial8250_console_write() {
 0.384 us   |    _raw_spin_lock_irqsave();
 1.836 us   |    io_serial_in();
 1.667 us   |    io_serial_out();
            |    uart_console_write() {
            |      serial8250_console_putchar() {
            |        wait_for_xmitr() {
 1.870 us   |          io_serial_in();
 2.238 us   |        }
 1.737 us   |        io_serial_out();
 4.318 us   |      }
 4.675 us   |    }
            |    wait_for_xmitr() {
 1.635 us   |      io_serial_in();
            |      __const_udelay() {
 1.125 us   |        delay_tsc();
 1.429 us   |      }
...
...
...
 1.683 us   |      io_serial_in();
            |      __const_udelay() {
 1.248 us   |        delay_tsc();
 1.486 us   |      }
 1.671 us   |      io_serial_in();
 411.342 us |    }

In another machine, I measured a throughput of 11.5KB/s, with the serial
controller taking between 80-90us to send each byte. That matches the
expected throughput for a configuration of 115200 bps.

This patch changes the serial8250_console_write to use the 16550 fifo
if available. In my benchmarks I got around 25% improvement in the slow
machine, and no performance penalty in the fast machine.
Signed-off-by: default avatarWander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220411174841.34936-2-wander@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 62b2caef
......@@ -2077,10 +2077,7 @@ static void serial8250_break_ctl(struct uart_port *port, int break_state)
serial8250_rpm_put(up);
}
/*
* Wait for transmitter & holding register to empty
*/
static void wait_for_xmitr(struct uart_8250_port *up, int bits)
static void wait_for_lsr(struct uart_8250_port *up, int bits)
{
unsigned int status, tmout = 10000;
......@@ -2097,6 +2094,16 @@ static void wait_for_xmitr(struct uart_8250_port *up, int bits)
udelay(1);
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
}
/*
* Wait for transmitter & holding register to empty
*/
static void wait_for_xmitr(struct uart_8250_port *up, int bits)
{
unsigned int tmout;
wait_for_lsr(up, bits);
/* Wait up to 1s for flow control if necessary */
if (up->port.flags & UPF_CONS_FLOW) {
......@@ -3332,6 +3339,35 @@ static void serial8250_console_restore(struct uart_8250_port *up)
serial8250_out_MCR(up, UART_MCR_DTR | UART_MCR_RTS);
}
/*
* Print a string to the serial port using the device FIFO
*
* It sends fifosize bytes and then waits for the fifo
* to get empty.
*/
static void serial8250_console_fifo_write(struct uart_8250_port *up,
const char *s, unsigned int count)
{
int i;
const char *end = s + count;
unsigned int fifosize = up->tx_loadsz;
bool cr_sent = false;
while (s != end) {
wait_for_lsr(up, UART_LSR_THRE);
for (i = 0; i < fifosize && s != end; ++i) {
if (*s == '\n' && !cr_sent) {
serial_out(up, UART_TX, '\r');
cr_sent = true;
} else {
serial_out(up, UART_TX, *s++);
cr_sent = false;
}
}
}
}
/*
* Print a string to the serial port trying not to disturb
* any possible real use of the port...
......@@ -3347,7 +3383,7 @@ void serial8250_console_write(struct uart_8250_port *up, const char *s,
struct uart_8250_em485 *em485 = up->em485;
struct uart_port *port = &up->port;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int ier;
unsigned int ier, use_fifo;
int locked = 1;
touch_nmi_watchdog();
......@@ -3379,7 +3415,30 @@ void serial8250_console_write(struct uart_8250_port *up, const char *s,
mdelay(port->rs485.delay_rts_before_send);
}
uart_console_write(port, s, count, serial8250_console_putchar);
use_fifo = (up->capabilities & UART_CAP_FIFO) &&
/*
* BCM283x requires to check the fifo
* after each byte.
*/
!(up->capabilities & UART_CAP_MINI) &&
/*
* tx_loadsz contains the transmit fifo size
*/
up->tx_loadsz > 1 &&
(up->fcr & UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO) &&
port->state &&
test_bit(TTY_PORT_INITIALIZED, &port->state->port.iflags) &&
/*
* After we put a data in the fifo, the controller will send
* it regardless of the CTS state. Therefore, only use fifo
* if we don't use control flow.
*/
!(up->port.flags & UPF_CONS_FLOW);
if (likely(use_fifo))
serial8250_console_fifo_write(up, s, count);
else
uart_console_write(port, s, count, serial8250_console_putchar);
/*
* Finally, wait for transmitter to become empty
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment