bpf: map_seq_next should always increase position index
If seq_file .next fuction does not change position index, read after some lseek can generate an unexpected output. See also: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 v1 -> v2: removed missed increment in end of function Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/eca84fdd-c374-a154-d874-6c7b55fc3bc4@virtuozzo.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment