Commit 923e1e7d authored by Mark Rutland's avatar Mark Rutland Committed by Catalin Marinas

arm64: uaccess: rename privileged uaccess routines

We currently have many uaccess_*{enable,disable}*() variants, which
subsequent patches will cut down as part of removing set_fs() and
friends. Once this simplification is made, most uaccess routines will
only need to ensure that the user page tables are mapped in TTBR0, as is
currently dealt with by uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}().

The existing uaccess_{enable,disable}() routines ensure that user page
tables are mapped in TTBR0, and also disable PAN protections, which is
necessary to be able to use atomics on user memory, but also permit
unrelated privileged accesses to access user memory.

As preparatory step, let's rename uaccess_{enable,disable}() to
uaccess_{enable,disable}_privileged(), highlighting this caveat and
discouraging wider misuse. Subsequent patches can reuse the
uaccess_{enable,disable}() naming for the common case of ensuring the
user page tables are mapped in TTBR0.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202131558.39270-5-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
parent 2376e75c
......@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
do { \
unsigned int loops = FUTEX_MAX_LOOPS; \
\
uaccess_enable(); \
uaccess_enable_privileged(); \
asm volatile( \
" prfm pstl1strm, %2\n" \
"1: ldxr %w1, %2\n" \
......@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ do { \
"+r" (loops) \
: "r" (oparg), "Ir" (-EFAULT), "Ir" (-EAGAIN) \
: "memory"); \
uaccess_disable(); \
uaccess_disable_privileged(); \
} while (0)
static inline int
......@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(u32 *uval, u32 __user *_uaddr,
return -EFAULT;
uaddr = __uaccess_mask_ptr(_uaddr);
uaccess_enable();
uaccess_enable_privileged();
asm volatile("// futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic\n"
" prfm pstl1strm, %2\n"
"1: ldxr %w1, %2\n"
......@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(u32 *uval, u32 __user *_uaddr,
: "+r" (ret), "=&r" (val), "+Q" (*uaddr), "=&r" (tmp), "+r" (loops)
: "r" (oldval), "r" (newval), "Ir" (-EFAULT), "Ir" (-EAGAIN)
: "memory");
uaccess_disable();
uaccess_disable_privileged();
if (!ret)
*uval = val;
......
......@@ -200,12 +200,12 @@ do { \
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)); \
} while (0)
static inline void uaccess_disable(void)
static inline void uaccess_disable_privileged(void)
{
__uaccess_disable(ARM64_HAS_PAN);
}
static inline void uaccess_enable(void)
static inline void uaccess_enable_privileged(void)
{
__uaccess_enable(ARM64_HAS_PAN);
}
......
......@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation_sysctl(void)
#define __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, temp2, B) \
do { \
uaccess_enable(); \
uaccess_enable_privileged(); \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
" mov %w3, %w7\n" \
"0: ldxr"B" %w2, [%4]\n" \
......@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ do { \
"i" (-EFAULT), \
"i" (__SWP_LL_SC_LOOPS) \
: "memory"); \
uaccess_disable(); \
uaccess_disable_privileged(); \
} while (0)
#define __user_swp_asm(data, addr, res, temp, temp2) \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment