Commit 92d71bc6 authored by Eugene Korenevsky's avatar Eugene Korenevsky Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: nVMX: remove unnecessary double caching of MAXPHYADDR

After speed-up of cpuid_maxphyaddr() it can be called frequently:
instead of heavyweight enumeration of CPUID entries it returns a cached
pre-computed value. It is also inlined now. So caching its result became
unnecessary and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20150329205644.GA1258@gnote>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 9090422f
......@@ -8866,9 +8866,9 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_apicv_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
static int nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned long count_field,
unsigned long addr_field,
int maxphyaddr)
unsigned long addr_field)
{
int maxphyaddr;
u64 count, addr;
if (vmcs12_read_any(vcpu, count_field, &count) ||
......@@ -8878,6 +8878,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
if (count == 0)
return 0;
maxphyaddr = cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu);
if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, 16) || addr >> maxphyaddr ||
(addr + count * sizeof(struct vmx_msr_entry) - 1) >> maxphyaddr) {
pr_warn_ratelimited(
......@@ -8891,19 +8892,16 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
static int nested_vmx_check_msr_switch_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
{
int maxphyaddr;
if (vmcs12->vm_exit_msr_load_count == 0 &&
vmcs12->vm_exit_msr_store_count == 0 &&
vmcs12->vm_entry_msr_load_count == 0)
return 0; /* Fast path */
maxphyaddr = cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu);
if (nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(vcpu, VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_COUNT,
VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_ADDR, maxphyaddr) ||
VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_ADDR) ||
nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(vcpu, VM_EXIT_MSR_STORE_COUNT,
VM_EXIT_MSR_STORE_ADDR, maxphyaddr) ||
VM_EXIT_MSR_STORE_ADDR) ||
nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(vcpu, VM_ENTRY_MSR_LOAD_COUNT,
VM_ENTRY_MSR_LOAD_ADDR, maxphyaddr))
VM_ENTRY_MSR_LOAD_ADDR))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment