Commit 93d0955e authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar

locking: Fix comment typos

A few snuck through.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 88b06399
...@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ enum lockdep_lock_type { ...@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ enum lockdep_lock_type {
* NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES ... Number of classes * NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES ... Number of classes
* cached in the instance of lockdep_map * cached in the instance of lockdep_map
* *
* Currently main class (subclass == 0) and signle depth subclass * Currently main class (subclass == 0) and single depth subclass
* are cached in lockdep_map. This optimization is mainly targeting * are cached in lockdep_map. This optimization is mainly targeting
* on rq->lock. double_rq_lock() acquires this highly competitive with * on rq->lock. double_rq_lock() acquires this highly competitive with
* single depth. * single depth.
......
...@@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, ...@@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1,
* If the caller intends to requeue more than 1 waiter to pifutex, * If the caller intends to requeue more than 1 waiter to pifutex,
* force futex_lock_pi_atomic() to set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit now, * force futex_lock_pi_atomic() to set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit now,
* as we have means to handle the possible fault. If not, don't set * as we have means to handle the possible fault. If not, don't set
* the bit unecessarily as it will force the subsequent unlock to enter * the bit unnecessarily as it will force the subsequent unlock to enter
* the kernel. * the kernel.
*/ */
top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb1, key1); top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb1, key1);
...@@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, ...@@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags,
continue; continue;
/* /*
* FUTEX_WAIT_REQEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always * FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always
* be paired with each other and no other futex ops. * be paired with each other and no other futex ops.
* *
* We should never be requeueing a futex_q with a pi_state, * We should never be requeueing a futex_q with a pi_state,
...@@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q) ...@@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
} }
/* /*
* PI futexes can not be requeued and must remove themself from the * PI futexes can not be requeued and must remove themselves from the
* hash bucket. The hash bucket lock (i.e. lock_ptr) is held. * hash bucket. The hash bucket lock (i.e. lock_ptr) is held.
*/ */
static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q) static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q)
...@@ -2903,7 +2903,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ...@@ -2903,7 +2903,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
*/ */
res = fixup_owner(uaddr, &q, !ret); res = fixup_owner(uaddr, &q, !ret);
/* /*
* If fixup_owner() returned an error, proprogate that. If it acquired * If fixup_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it acquired
* the lock, clear our -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR. * the lock, clear our -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR.
*/ */
if (res) if (res)
...@@ -3280,7 +3280,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ...@@ -3280,7 +3280,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
*/ */
res = fixup_owner(uaddr2, &q, !ret); res = fixup_owner(uaddr2, &q, !ret);
/* /*
* If fixup_owner() returned an error, proprogate that. If it * If fixup_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it
* acquired the lock, clear -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR. * acquired the lock, clear -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR.
*/ */
if (res) if (res)
...@@ -3678,7 +3678,7 @@ void futex_exec_release(struct task_struct *tsk) ...@@ -3678,7 +3678,7 @@ void futex_exec_release(struct task_struct *tsk)
{ {
/* /*
* The state handling is done for consistency, but in the case of * The state handling is done for consistency, but in the case of
* exec() there is no way to prevent futher damage as the PID stays * exec() there is no way to prevent further damage as the PID stays
* the same. But for the unlikely and arguably buggy case that a * the same. But for the unlikely and arguably buggy case that a
* futex is held on exec(), this provides at least as much state * futex is held on exec(), this provides at least as much state
* consistency protection which is possible. * consistency protection which is possible.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment