[PATCH] Spelling fixes: ugliness

    uglyness -> ugliness

drivers/net/irda/irda-usb.c

@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats *irda_usb_net_get_stats(struct net_device *dev);
 /************************ TRANSMIT ROUTINES ************************/
 /*
  * Receive packets from the IrDA stack and send them on the USB pipe.
- * Handle speed change, timeout and lot's of uglyness...
+ * Handle speed change, timeout and lot's of ugliness...
  */
 
 /*------------------------------------------------------------------*/

include/asm-cris/uaccess.h

@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ extern unsigned long search_exception_table(unsigned long);
  * This gets kind of ugly. We want to return _two_ values in "get_user()"
  * and yet we don't want to do any pointers, because that is too much
  * of a performance impact. Thus we have a few rather ugly macros here,
- * and hide all the uglyness from the user.
+ * and hide all the ugliness from the user.
  *
  * The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions are versions that
  * do not verify the address space, that must have been done previously

include/asm-i386/uaccess.h

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ extern int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
  * This gets kind of ugly. We want to return _two_ values in "get_user()"
  * and yet we don't want to do any pointers, because that is too much
  * of a performance impact. Thus we have a few rather ugly macros here,
- * and hide all the uglyness from the user.
+ * and hide all the ugliness from the user.
  *
  * The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions are versions that
  * do not verify the address space, that must have been done previously

include/asm-ppc/uaccess.h

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ extern void sort_exception_table(void);
  * This gets kind of ugly. We want to return _two_ values in "get_user()"
  * and yet we don't want to do any pointers, because that is too much
  * of a performance impact. Thus we have a few rather ugly macros here,
- * and hide all the uglyness from the user.
+ * and hide all the ugliness from the user.
  *
  * The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions are versions that
  * do not verify the address space, that must have been done previously

include/asm-ppc64/uaccess.h

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ extern void sort_exception_table(void);
  * This gets kind of ugly. We want to return _two_ values in "get_user()"
  * and yet we don't want to do any pointers, because that is too much
  * of a performance impact. Thus we have a few rather ugly macros here,
- * and hide all the uglyness from the user.
+ * and hide all the ugliness from the user.
  *
  * The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions are versions that
  * do not verify the address space, that must have been done previously

include/asm-sparc/uaccess.h

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ extern void __ret_efault(void);
  * This gets kind of ugly. We want to return _two_ values in "get_user()"
  * and yet we don't want to do any pointers, because that is too much
  * of a performance impact. Thus we have a few rather ugly macros here,
- * and hide all the uglyness from the user.
+ * and hide all the ugliness from the user.
  */
 #define put_user(x,ptr) ({ \
 unsigned long __pu_addr = (unsigned long)(ptr); \

include/asm-sparc64/uaccess.h

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ extern void __ret_efault(void);
  * This gets kind of ugly. We want to return _two_ values in "get_user()"
  * and yet we don't want to do any pointers, because that is too much
  * of a performance impact. Thus we have a few rather ugly macros here,
- * and hide all the uglyness from the user.
+ * and hide all the ugliness from the user.
  */
 #define put_user(x,ptr) ({ \
 unsigned long __pu_addr = (unsigned long)(ptr); \

include/asm-x86_64/uaccess.h

@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct exception_table_entry
  * This gets kind of ugly. We want to return _two_ values in "get_user()"
  * and yet we don't want to do any pointers, because that is too much
  * of a performance impact. Thus we have a few rather ugly macros here,
- * and hide all the uglyness from the user.
+ * and hide all the ugliness from the user.
  *
  * The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions are versions that
  * do not verify the address space, that must have been done previously