Commit 94901e1b authored by Alexander Sverdlin's avatar Alexander Sverdlin Committed by Vinod Koul

dmaengine: ep93xx: Treat STALL and NFB IRQs same way

Debugging ALSA hangups it was found that EP9302 (latest E2 rev.) DMA controller
sometimes asserts STALL interrupt instead of NFB interrupt. Simply ignoring the
difference and simply acting upon the amount of data we still have to transfer
seems to work fine. This somehow sounds similar to M2M issue which is already
dealt with in the driver, when the controller asserts DONE interrupt too early.

The issue is not documented in Cirrus Logic erratas for EP93XX, but original
Cirrus DMA driver from 2003 (not based on DMA API) did the similar handling
of STALL interrupt. In-tree driver (6d831c65) did it also, before conversion to
DMA engine API.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
parent c9784a46
......@@ -421,23 +421,25 @@ static int m2p_hw_interrupt(struct ep93xx_dma_chan *edmac)
desc->size);
}
switch (irq_status & (M2P_INTERRUPT_STALL | M2P_INTERRUPT_NFB)) {
case M2P_INTERRUPT_STALL:
/* Disable interrupts */
control = readl(edmac->regs + M2P_CONTROL);
control &= ~(M2P_CONTROL_STALLINT | M2P_CONTROL_NFBINT);
m2p_set_control(edmac, control);
return INTERRUPT_DONE;
case M2P_INTERRUPT_NFB:
if (ep93xx_dma_advance_active(edmac))
m2p_fill_desc(edmac);
/*
* Even latest E2 silicon revision sometimes assert STALL interrupt
* instead of NFB. Therefore we treat them equally, basing on the
* amount of data we still have to transfer.
*/
if (!(irq_status & (M2P_INTERRUPT_STALL | M2P_INTERRUPT_NFB)))
return INTERRUPT_UNKNOWN;
if (ep93xx_dma_advance_active(edmac)) {
m2p_fill_desc(edmac);
return INTERRUPT_NEXT_BUFFER;
}
return INTERRUPT_UNKNOWN;
/* Disable interrupts */
control = readl(edmac->regs + M2P_CONTROL);
control &= ~(M2P_CONTROL_STALLINT | M2P_CONTROL_NFBINT);
m2p_set_control(edmac, control);
return INTERRUPT_DONE;
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment