Commit 949090ea authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra

sched/eevdf: Remove min_vruntime_copy

Since commit e8f331bc ("sched/smp: Use lag to simplify
cross-runqueue placement") the min_vruntime_copy is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarValentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarValentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105028.395297941@infradead.org
parent f25b7b32
...@@ -779,8 +779,7 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) ...@@ -779,8 +779,7 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
} }
/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */ /* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, cfs_rq->min_vruntime = __update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq, vruntime);
__update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq, vruntime));
} }
static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
...@@ -12933,7 +12932,7 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first) ...@@ -12933,7 +12932,7 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{ {
cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED; cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, (u64)(-(1LL << 20))); cfs_rq->min_vruntime = (u64)(-(1LL << 20));
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock); raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock);
#endif #endif
......
...@@ -613,10 +613,6 @@ struct cfs_rq { ...@@ -613,10 +613,6 @@ struct cfs_rq {
u64 min_vruntime_fi; u64 min_vruntime_fi;
#endif #endif
#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
u64 min_vruntime_copy;
#endif
struct rb_root_cached tasks_timeline; struct rb_root_cached tasks_timeline;
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment