Commit 94d78e18 authored by Roel Kluin's avatar Roel Kluin Committed by Jean Delvare

i2c-algo-pcf: Handle timeout correctly

With a postfix decrement these timeouts reach -1 rather than 0, but after the
loop it is tested whether they have become 0.

As pointed out by Jean Delvare, the msg_num should be tested before the timeout.
With the current order, you could exit with a timeout error while all the
messages were successfully transferred.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Acked-by: default avatarEric Brower <ebrower@gmail.com>
parent 0c168ceb
......@@ -115,15 +115,17 @@ static int wait_for_bb(struct i2c_algo_pcf_data *adap)
status = get_pcf(adap, 1);
while (timeout-- && !(status & I2C_PCF_BB)) {
while (!(status & I2C_PCF_BB) && --timeout) {
udelay(100); /* wait for 100 us */
status = get_pcf(adap, 1);
}
if (timeout <= 0)
if (timeout == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Timeout waiting for Bus Busy\n");
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
return timeout <= 0;
return 0;
}
static int wait_for_pin(struct i2c_algo_pcf_data *adap, int *status)
......@@ -133,7 +135,7 @@ static int wait_for_pin(struct i2c_algo_pcf_data *adap, int *status)
*status = get_pcf(adap, 1);
while (timeout-- && (*status & I2C_PCF_PIN)) {
while ((*status & I2C_PCF_PIN) && --timeout) {
adap->waitforpin(adap->data);
*status = get_pcf(adap, 1);
}
......@@ -142,10 +144,10 @@ static int wait_for_pin(struct i2c_algo_pcf_data *adap, int *status)
return -EINTR;
}
if (timeout <= 0)
return -1;
else
return 0;
if (timeout == 0)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
return 0;
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment