Commit 950bf4f1 authored by Leon Romanovsky's avatar Leon Romanovsky Committed by Jason Gunthorpe

RDMA/mlx5: Fix access to wrong pointer while performing flush due to error

The main difference between send and receive SW completions is related to
separate treatment of WQ queue. For receive completions, the initial index
to be flushed is stored in "tail", while for send completions, it is in
deleted "last_poll".

  CPU: 54 PID: 53405 Comm: kworker/u161:0 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G           OE    --------- -t - 4.18.0-147.el8.ppc64le #1
  Workqueue: ib-comp-unb-wq ib_cq_poll_work [ib_core]
  NIP:  c000003c7c00a000 LR: c00800000e586af4 CTR: c000003c7c00a000
  REGS: c0000036cc9db940 TRAP: 0400   Tainted: G           OE    --------- -t -  (4.18.0-147.el8.ppc64le)
  MSR:  9000000010009033 <SF,HV,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 24004488  XER: 20040000
  CFAR: c00800000e586af0 IRQMASK: 0
  GPR00: c00800000e586ab4 c0000036cc9dbbc0 c00800000e5f1a00 c0000037d8433800
  GPR04: c000003895a26800 c0000037293f2000 0000000000000201 0000000000000011
  GPR08: c000003895a26c80 c000003c7c00a000 0000000000000000 c00800000ed30438
  GPR12: c000003c7c00a000 c000003fff684b80 c00000000017c388 c00000396ec4be40
  GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
  GPR20: c00000000151e498 0000000000000010 c000003895a26848 0000000000000010
  GPR24: 0000000000000010 0000000000010000 c000003895a26800 0000000000000000
  GPR28: 0000000000000010 c0000037d8433800 c000003895a26c80 c000003895a26800
  NIP [c000003c7c00a000] 0xc000003c7c00a000
  LR [c00800000e586af4] __ib_process_cq+0xec/0x1b0 [ib_core]
  Call Trace:
  [c0000036cc9dbbc0] [c00800000e586ab4] __ib_process_cq+0xac/0x1b0 [ib_core] (unreliable)
  [c0000036cc9dbc40] [c00800000e586c88] ib_cq_poll_work+0x40/0xb0 [ib_core]
  [c0000036cc9dbc70] [c000000000171f44] process_one_work+0x2f4/0x5c0
  [c0000036cc9dbd10] [c000000000172a0c] worker_thread+0xcc/0x760
  [c0000036cc9dbdc0] [c00000000017c52c] kthread+0x1ac/0x1c0
  [c0000036cc9dbe30] [c00000000000b75c] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x80

Fixes: 8e3b6883 ("RDMA/mlx5: Delete unreachable handle_atomic code by simplifying SW completion")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200318091640.44069-1-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarLeon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
parent 2d47fbac
...@@ -330,6 +330,22 @@ static void mlx5_handle_error_cqe(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, ...@@ -330,6 +330,22 @@ static void mlx5_handle_error_cqe(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
dump_cqe(dev, cqe); dump_cqe(dev, cqe);
} }
static void handle_atomics(struct mlx5_ib_qp *qp, struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe64,
u16 tail, u16 head)
{
u16 idx;
do {
idx = tail & (qp->sq.wqe_cnt - 1);
if (idx == head)
break;
tail = qp->sq.w_list[idx].next;
} while (1);
tail = qp->sq.w_list[idx].next;
qp->sq.last_poll = tail;
}
static void free_cq_buf(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx5_ib_cq_buf *buf) static void free_cq_buf(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx5_ib_cq_buf *buf)
{ {
mlx5_frag_buf_free(dev->mdev, &buf->frag_buf); mlx5_frag_buf_free(dev->mdev, &buf->frag_buf);
...@@ -368,7 +384,7 @@ static void get_sig_err_item(struct mlx5_sig_err_cqe *cqe, ...@@ -368,7 +384,7 @@ static void get_sig_err_item(struct mlx5_sig_err_cqe *cqe,
} }
static void sw_comp(struct mlx5_ib_qp *qp, int num_entries, struct ib_wc *wc, static void sw_comp(struct mlx5_ib_qp *qp, int num_entries, struct ib_wc *wc,
int *npolled, int is_send) int *npolled, bool is_send)
{ {
struct mlx5_ib_wq *wq; struct mlx5_ib_wq *wq;
unsigned int cur; unsigned int cur;
...@@ -383,10 +399,16 @@ static void sw_comp(struct mlx5_ib_qp *qp, int num_entries, struct ib_wc *wc, ...@@ -383,10 +399,16 @@ static void sw_comp(struct mlx5_ib_qp *qp, int num_entries, struct ib_wc *wc,
return; return;
for (i = 0; i < cur && np < num_entries; i++) { for (i = 0; i < cur && np < num_entries; i++) {
wc->wr_id = wq->wrid[wq->tail & (wq->wqe_cnt - 1)]; unsigned int idx;
idx = (is_send) ? wq->last_poll : wq->tail;
idx &= (wq->wqe_cnt - 1);
wc->wr_id = wq->wrid[idx];
wc->status = IB_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR; wc->status = IB_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR;
wc->vendor_err = MLX5_CQE_SYNDROME_WR_FLUSH_ERR; wc->vendor_err = MLX5_CQE_SYNDROME_WR_FLUSH_ERR;
wq->tail++; wq->tail++;
if (is_send)
wq->last_poll = wq->w_list[idx].next;
np++; np++;
wc->qp = &qp->ibqp; wc->qp = &qp->ibqp;
wc++; wc++;
...@@ -473,6 +495,7 @@ static int mlx5_poll_one(struct mlx5_ib_cq *cq, ...@@ -473,6 +495,7 @@ static int mlx5_poll_one(struct mlx5_ib_cq *cq,
wqe_ctr = be16_to_cpu(cqe64->wqe_counter); wqe_ctr = be16_to_cpu(cqe64->wqe_counter);
idx = wqe_ctr & (wq->wqe_cnt - 1); idx = wqe_ctr & (wq->wqe_cnt - 1);
handle_good_req(wc, cqe64, wq, idx); handle_good_req(wc, cqe64, wq, idx);
handle_atomics(*cur_qp, cqe64, wq->last_poll, idx);
wc->wr_id = wq->wrid[idx]; wc->wr_id = wq->wrid[idx];
wq->tail = wq->wqe_head[idx] + 1; wq->tail = wq->wqe_head[idx] + 1;
wc->status = IB_WC_SUCCESS; wc->status = IB_WC_SUCCESS;
......
...@@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ struct mlx5_ib_wq { ...@@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ struct mlx5_ib_wq {
unsigned head; unsigned head;
unsigned tail; unsigned tail;
u16 cur_post; u16 cur_post;
u16 last_poll;
void *cur_edge; void *cur_edge;
}; };
......
...@@ -3775,6 +3775,7 @@ static int __mlx5_ib_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *ibqp, ...@@ -3775,6 +3775,7 @@ static int __mlx5_ib_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *ibqp,
qp->sq.cur_post = 0; qp->sq.cur_post = 0;
if (qp->sq.wqe_cnt) if (qp->sq.wqe_cnt)
qp->sq.cur_edge = get_sq_edge(&qp->sq, 0); qp->sq.cur_edge = get_sq_edge(&qp->sq, 0);
qp->sq.last_poll = 0;
qp->db.db[MLX5_RCV_DBR] = 0; qp->db.db[MLX5_RCV_DBR] = 0;
qp->db.db[MLX5_SND_DBR] = 0; qp->db.db[MLX5_SND_DBR] = 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment