Commit 959c8963 authored by Vladimir Davydov's avatar Vladimir Davydov Committed by Linus Torvalds

memcg, slab: fix barrier usage when accessing memcg_caches

Each root kmem_cache has pointers to per-memcg caches stored in its
memcg_params::memcg_caches array.  Whenever we want to allocate a slab
for a memcg, we access this array to get per-memcg cache to allocate
from (see memcg_kmem_get_cache()).  The access must be lock-free for
performance reasons, so we should use barriers to assert the kmem_cache
is up-to-date.

First, we should place a write barrier immediately before setting the
pointer to it in the memcg_caches array in order to make sure nobody
will see a partially initialized object.  Second, we should issue a read
barrier before dereferencing the pointer to conform to the write
barrier.

However, currently the barrier usage looks rather strange.  We have a
write barrier *after* setting the pointer and a read barrier *before*
reading the pointer, which is incorrect.  This patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 1aa13254
......@@ -3274,12 +3274,14 @@ void memcg_register_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
list_add(&s->memcg_params->list, &memcg->memcg_slab_caches);
mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = s;
/*
* the readers won't lock, make sure everybody sees the updated value,
* so they won't put stuff in the queue again for no reason
* Since readers won't lock (see cache_from_memcg_idx()), we need a
* barrier here to ensure nobody will see the kmem_cache partially
* initialized.
*/
wmb();
smp_wmb();
root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = s;
}
void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
......@@ -3605,7 +3607,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
gfp_t gfp)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
int idx;
struct kmem_cache *memcg_cachep;
VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params);
VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params->is_root_cache);
......@@ -3619,15 +3621,9 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
if (!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg))
goto out;
idx = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
/*
* barrier to mare sure we're always seeing the up to date value. The
* code updating memcg_caches will issue a write barrier to match this.
*/
read_barrier_depends();
if (likely(cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx))) {
cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx);
memcg_cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, memcg_cache_id(memcg));
if (likely(memcg_cachep)) {
cachep = memcg_cachep;
goto out;
}
......
......@@ -163,9 +163,19 @@ static inline const char *cache_name(struct kmem_cache *s)
static inline struct kmem_cache *
cache_from_memcg_idx(struct kmem_cache *s, int idx)
{
struct kmem_cache *cachep;
if (!s->memcg_params)
return NULL;
return s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
cachep = s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
/*
* Make sure we will access the up-to-date value. The code updating
* memcg_caches issues a write barrier to match this (see
* memcg_register_cache()).
*/
smp_read_barrier_depends();
return cachep;
}
static inline struct kmem_cache *memcg_root_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment