Commit 980c41f5 authored by Shameer Kolothum's avatar Shameer Kolothum Committed by Marc Zyngier

KVM: arm64: Make the exposed feature bits in AA64DFR0_EL1 writable from userspace

KVM exposes the OS double lock feature bit to Guests but returns
RAZ/WI on Guest OSDLR_EL1 access. This breaks Guest migration between
systems where this feature differ. Add support to make this feature
writable from userspace by setting the mask bit. While at it, set the
mask bits for the exposed WRPs(Number of Watchpoints) as well.
Also update the selftest to cover these fields.

However we still can't make BRPs and CTX_CMPs fields writable, because
as per ARM ARM DDI 0487K.a, section D2.8.3 Breakpoint types and
linking of breakpoints, highest numbered breakpoints(BRPs) must be
context aware breakpoints(CTX_CMPs). KVM does not trap + emulate the
breakpoint registers, and as such cannot support a layout that misaligns
with the underlying hardware.
Reviewed-by: default avatarOliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240816132819.34316-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
parent 7c626ce4
......@@ -2376,7 +2376,21 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
.get_user = get_id_reg,
.set_user = set_id_aa64dfr0_el1,
.reset = read_sanitised_id_aa64dfr0_el1,
.val = ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK |
/*
* Prior to FEAT_Debugv8.9, the architecture defines context-aware
* breakpoints (CTX_CMPs) as the highest numbered breakpoints (BRPs).
* KVM does not trap + emulate the breakpoint registers, and as such
* cannot support a layout that misaligns with the underlying hardware.
* While it may be possible to describe a subset that aligns with
* hardware, just prevent changes to BRPs and CTX_CMPs altogether for
* simplicity.
*
* See DDI0487K.a, section D2.8.3 Breakpoint types and linking
* of breakpoints for more details.
*/
.val = ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DoubleLock_MASK |
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_WRPs_MASK |
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK |
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_MASK, },
ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(5,2),
......
......@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ struct test_feature_reg {
}
static const struct reg_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0_el1[] = {
S_REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, DoubleLock, 0),
REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, WRPs, 0),
S_REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMUVer, 0),
REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, DebugVer, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_IMP),
REG_FTR_END,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment