Commit 98f5ce7e authored by David Howells's avatar David Howells Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

afs: Fix lock-wait/callback-break double locking

[ Upstream commit c7226e40 ]

__afs_break_callback() holds vnode->lock around its call of
afs_lock_may_be_available() - which also takes that lock.

Fix this by not taking the lock in __afs_break_callback().

Also, there's no point checking the granted_locks and pending_locks queues;
it's sufficient to check lock_state, so move that check out of
afs_lock_may_be_available() into __afs_break_callback() to replace the
queue checks.

Fixes: e8d6c554 ("AFS: implement file locking")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent 2fd90073
......@@ -221,14 +221,8 @@ void afs_break_callback(struct afs_vnode *vnode)
vnode->cb_break++;
afs_clear_permits(vnode);
spin_lock(&vnode->lock);
_debug("break callback");
if (list_empty(&vnode->granted_locks) &&
!list_empty(&vnode->pending_locks))
if (vnode->lock_state == AFS_VNODE_LOCK_WAITING_FOR_CB)
afs_lock_may_be_available(vnode);
spin_unlock(&vnode->lock);
}
write_sequnlock(&vnode->cb_lock);
......
......@@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ void afs_lock_may_be_available(struct afs_vnode *vnode)
{
_enter("{%x:%u}", vnode->fid.vid, vnode->fid.vnode);
if (vnode->lock_state != AFS_VNODE_LOCK_WAITING_FOR_CB)
return;
spin_lock(&vnode->lock);
if (vnode->lock_state == AFS_VNODE_LOCK_WAITING_FOR_CB)
afs_next_locker(vnode, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment