Commit 9d6ba260 authored by Xin Long's avatar Xin Long Committed by Jakub Kicinski

sctp: create udp6 sock and set its encap_rcv

This patch is to add the udp6 sock part in sctp_udp_sock_start/stop().
udp_conf.use_udp6_rx_checksums is set to true, as:

   "The SCTP checksum MUST be computed for IPv4 and IPv6, and the UDP
    checksum SHOULD be computed for IPv4 and IPv6"

says in rfc6951#section-5.3.

v1->v2:
  - Add pr_err() when fails to create udp v6 sock.
  - Add #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) not to create v6 sock when ipv6 is
    disabled.
Signed-off-by: default avatarXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 965ae444
......@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct netns_sctp {
/* UDP tunneling listening sock. */
struct sock *udp4_sock;
struct sock *udp6_sock;
/* UDP tunneling listening port. */
int udp_port;
......
......@@ -869,6 +869,28 @@ int sctp_udp_sock_start(struct net *net)
setup_udp_tunnel_sock(net, sock, &tuncfg);
net->sctp.udp4_sock = sock->sk;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
memset(&udp_conf, 0, sizeof(udp_conf));
udp_conf.family = AF_INET6;
udp_conf.local_ip6 = in6addr_any;
udp_conf.local_udp_port = htons(net->sctp.udp_port);
udp_conf.use_udp6_rx_checksums = true;
udp_conf.ipv6_v6only = true;
err = udp_sock_create(net, &udp_conf, &sock);
if (err) {
pr_err("Failed to create the SCTP UDP tunneling v6 sock\n");
udp_tunnel_sock_release(net->sctp.udp4_sock->sk_socket);
net->sctp.udp4_sock = NULL;
return err;
}
tuncfg.encap_type = 1;
tuncfg.encap_rcv = sctp_udp_rcv;
setup_udp_tunnel_sock(net, sock, &tuncfg);
net->sctp.udp6_sock = sock->sk;
#endif
return 0;
}
......@@ -878,6 +900,10 @@ void sctp_udp_sock_stop(struct net *net)
udp_tunnel_sock_release(net->sctp.udp4_sock->sk_socket);
net->sctp.udp4_sock = NULL;
}
if (net->sctp.udp6_sock) {
udp_tunnel_sock_release(net->sctp.udp6_sock->sk_socket);
net->sctp.udp6_sock = NULL;
}
}
/* Register address family specific functions. */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment