Commit 9e401275 authored by Wladislav Wiebe's avatar Wladislav Wiebe Committed by Rob Herring

of: fdt: fix memory initialization for expanded DT

Already existing property flags are filled wrong for properties created from
initial FDT. This could cause problems if this DYNAMIC device-tree functions
are used later, i.e. properties are attached/detached/replaced. Simply dumping
flags from the running system show, that some initial static (not allocated via
kzmalloc()) nodes are marked as dynamic.

I putted some debug extensions to property_proc_show(..) :
..
+       if (OF_IS_DYNAMIC(pp))
+               pr_err("DEBUG: xxx : OF_IS_DYNAMIC\n");
+       if (OF_IS_DETACHED(pp))
+               pr_err("DEBUG: xxx : OF_IS_DETACHED\n");

when you operate on the nodes (e.g.: ~$ cat /proc/device-tree/*some_node*) you
will see that those flags are filled wrong, basically in most cases it will dump
a DYNAMIC or DETACHED status, which is in not true.
(BTW. this OF_IS_DETACHED is a own define for debug purposes which which just
make a test_bit(OF_DETACHED, &x->_flags)

If nodes are dynamic kernel is allowed to kfree() them. But it will crash
attempting to do so on the nodes from FDT -- they are not allocated via
kzmalloc().
Signed-off-by: default avatarWladislav Wiebe <wladislav.kw@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarAlexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
parent d4e4ab86
...@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ static void __unflatten_device_tree(struct boot_param_header *blob, ...@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ static void __unflatten_device_tree(struct boot_param_header *blob,
mem = (unsigned long) mem = (unsigned long)
dt_alloc(size + 4, __alignof__(struct device_node)); dt_alloc(size + 4, __alignof__(struct device_node));
memset((void *)mem, 0, size);
((__be32 *)mem)[size / 4] = cpu_to_be32(0xdeadbeef); ((__be32 *)mem)[size / 4] = cpu_to_be32(0xdeadbeef);
pr_debug(" unflattening %lx...\n", mem); pr_debug(" unflattening %lx...\n", mem);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment