Commit 9ec9b5ac authored by Ralf Baechle's avatar Ralf Baechle

MIPS: Fix harmlessly missing else statement.

The actual bug is a missing else statement - but really this should be
expressed using a switch() statement.

Found by Al Viro who writes "the funny thing is, it *does* work only
because r2 is syscall number and syscall number around 512 => return
value being ENOSYS and not one of ERESTART...  so we really can't hit
the first if and emerge from it with ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK.  still
wrong to write it that way..."
Signed-off-by: default avatarRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
parent 90c9e79f
......@@ -568,17 +568,20 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
if (regs->regs[0]) {
if (regs->regs[2] == ERESTARTNOHAND ||
regs->regs[2] == ERESTARTSYS ||
regs->regs[2] == ERESTARTNOINTR) {
switch (regs->regs[2]) {
case ERESTARTNOHAND:
case ERESTARTSYS:
case ERESTARTNOINTR:
regs->regs[2] = regs->regs[0];
regs->regs[7] = regs->regs[26];
regs->cp0_epc -= 4;
}
if (regs->regs[2] == ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK) {
break;
case ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK:
regs->regs[2] = current->thread.abi->restart;
regs->regs[7] = regs->regs[26];
regs->cp0_epc -= 4;
break;
}
regs->regs[0] = 0; /* Don't deal with this again. */
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment