Commit 9fef72ce authored by Avi Kivity's avatar Avi Kivity

KVM: x86 emulator: merge the two emulate_1op_rax_rdx implementations

We have two emulate-with-extended-accumulator implementations: once
which expect traps (_ex) and one which doesn't (plain).  Drop the
plain implementation and always use the one which expects traps;
it will simply return 0 in the _ex argument and we can happily ignore
it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
parent d1eef45d
...@@ -322,21 +322,7 @@ struct gprefix { ...@@ -322,21 +322,7 @@ struct gprefix {
} \ } \
} while (0) } while (0)
#define __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _suffix) \ #define __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _suffix, _ex) \
do { \
unsigned long _tmp; \
\
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
_PRE_EFLAGS("0", "4", "1") \
_op _suffix " %5; " \
_POST_EFLAGS("0", "4", "1") \
: "=m" (_eflags), "=&r" (_tmp), \
"+a" (_rax), "+d" (_rdx) \
: "i" (EFLAGS_MASK), "m" ((_src).val), \
"a" (_rax), "d" (_rdx)); \
} while (0)
#define __emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _suffix, _ex) \
do { \ do { \
unsigned long _tmp; \ unsigned long _tmp; \
\ \
...@@ -358,46 +344,24 @@ struct gprefix { ...@@ -358,46 +344,24 @@ struct gprefix {
} while (0) } while (0)
/* instruction has only one source operand, destination is implicit (e.g. mul, div, imul, idiv) */ /* instruction has only one source operand, destination is implicit (e.g. mul, div, imul, idiv) */
#define emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags) \ #define emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _ex) \
do { \ do { \
switch((_src).bytes) { \ switch((_src).bytes) { \
case 1: \ case 1: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \ __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
_eflags, "b"); \ _eflags, "b", _ex); \
break; \ break; \
case 2: \ case 2: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \ __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
_eflags, "w"); \ _eflags, "w", _ex); \
break; \ break; \
case 4: \ case 4: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \ __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
_eflags, "l"); \ _eflags, "l", _ex); \
break; \
case 8: \
ON64(__emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
_eflags, "q")); \
break; \
} \
} while (0)
#define emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _ex) \
do { \
switch((_src).bytes) { \
case 1: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
_eflags, "b", _ex); \
break; \
case 2: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
_eflags, "w", _ex); \
break; \
case 4: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
_eflags, "l", _ex); \
break; \ break; \
case 8: ON64( \ case 8: ON64( \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \ __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
_eflags, "q", _ex)); \ _eflags, "q", _ex)); \
break; \ break; \
} \ } \
} while (0) } while (0)
...@@ -1718,18 +1682,20 @@ static int em_grp3(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) ...@@ -1718,18 +1682,20 @@ static int em_grp3(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
emulate_1op(ctxt, "neg"); emulate_1op(ctxt, "neg");
break; break;
case 4: /* mul */ case 4: /* mul */
emulate_1op_rax_rdx("mul", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx, ctxt->eflags); emulate_1op_rax_rdx("mul", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
ctxt->eflags, de);
break; break;
case 5: /* imul */ case 5: /* imul */
emulate_1op_rax_rdx("imul", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx, ctxt->eflags); emulate_1op_rax_rdx("imul", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
ctxt->eflags, de);
break; break;
case 6: /* div */ case 6: /* div */
emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex("div", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx, emulate_1op_rax_rdx("div", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
ctxt->eflags, de); ctxt->eflags, de);
break; break;
case 7: /* idiv */ case 7: /* idiv */
emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex("idiv", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx, emulate_1op_rax_rdx("idiv", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
ctxt->eflags, de); ctxt->eflags, de);
break; break;
default: default:
return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE; return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment