Commit a0e35322 authored by Feng Tang's avatar Feng Tang Committed by Samuel Ortiz

mfd: lpc_ich: Fix a 3.5 kernel regression for iTCO_wdt driver

There are many reports (including 2 of my machines) that iTCO_wdt watchdog
driver fails to be initialized in 3.5 kernel with error message like:

[    5.265175] ACPI Warning: 0x00001060-0x0000107f SystemIO conflicts with Region \_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.TCOI 1 (20120320/utaddress-251)
[    5.265192] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver
[    5.265206] lpc_ich: Resource conflict(s) found affecting iTCO_wdt

The root cause the iTCO_wdt driver in 3.4 probes the HW IO resource from
LPC's PCI config space, while in 3.5 kernel it relies on lpc_ich driver
for the probe, which adds a new acpi_check_resource_conflict() check, and
give up the probe if there is any conflict with ACPI.

Fix it by removing all the checks for iTCO_wdt to keep the same behavior as
3.4 kernel.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44991

Actually the same check could be removed for the gpio-ich in lpc_ich.c,
but I'm not sure if it will cause problems.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFeng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Aaron Sierra <asierra@xes-inc.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
parent 1922b0f2
...@@ -765,7 +765,6 @@ static int __devinit lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev, ...@@ -765,7 +765,6 @@ static int __devinit lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev,
u32 base_addr_cfg; u32 base_addr_cfg;
u32 base_addr; u32 base_addr;
int ret; int ret;
bool acpi_conflict = false;
struct resource *res; struct resource *res;
/* Setup power management base register */ /* Setup power management base register */
...@@ -780,20 +779,11 @@ static int __devinit lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev, ...@@ -780,20 +779,11 @@ static int __devinit lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev,
res = wdt_io_res(ICH_RES_IO_TCO); res = wdt_io_res(ICH_RES_IO_TCO);
res->start = base_addr + ACPIBASE_TCO_OFF; res->start = base_addr + ACPIBASE_TCO_OFF;
res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_TCO_END; res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_TCO_END;
ret = acpi_check_resource_conflict(res);
if (ret) {
acpi_conflict = true;
goto wdt_done;
}
res = wdt_io_res(ICH_RES_IO_SMI); res = wdt_io_res(ICH_RES_IO_SMI);
res->start = base_addr + ACPIBASE_SMI_OFF; res->start = base_addr + ACPIBASE_SMI_OFF;
res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_SMI_END; res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_SMI_END;
ret = acpi_check_resource_conflict(res);
if (ret) {
acpi_conflict = true;
goto wdt_done;
}
lpc_ich_enable_acpi_space(dev); lpc_ich_enable_acpi_space(dev);
/* /*
...@@ -813,11 +803,6 @@ static int __devinit lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev, ...@@ -813,11 +803,6 @@ static int __devinit lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev,
res = wdt_mem_res(ICH_RES_MEM_GCS); res = wdt_mem_res(ICH_RES_MEM_GCS);
res->start = base_addr + ACPIBASE_GCS_OFF; res->start = base_addr + ACPIBASE_GCS_OFF;
res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_GCS_END; res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_GCS_END;
ret = acpi_check_resource_conflict(res);
if (ret) {
acpi_conflict = true;
goto wdt_done;
}
} }
lpc_ich_finalize_cell(&lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT], id); lpc_ich_finalize_cell(&lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT], id);
...@@ -825,9 +810,6 @@ static int __devinit lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev, ...@@ -825,9 +810,6 @@ static int __devinit lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev,
1, NULL, 0); 1, NULL, 0);
wdt_done: wdt_done:
if (acpi_conflict)
pr_warn("Resource conflict(s) found affecting %s\n",
lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT].name);
return ret; return ret;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment