Commit a13bd91b authored by Yu Kuai's avatar Yu Kuai Committed by Jens Axboe

block/rq_qos: protect rq_qos apis with a new lock

commit 50e34d78 ("block: disable the elevator int del_gendisk")
move rq_qos_exit() from disk_release() to del_gendisk(), this will
introduce some problems:

1) If rq_qos_add() is triggered by enabling iocost/iolatency through
   cgroupfs, then it can concurrent with del_gendisk(), it's not safe to
   write 'q->rq_qos' concurrently.

2) Activate cgroup policy that is relied on rq_qos will call
   rq_qos_add() and blkcg_activate_policy(), and if rq_qos_exit() is
   called in the middle, null-ptr-dereference will be triggered in
   blkcg_activate_policy().

3) blkg_conf_open_bdev() can call blkdev_get_no_open() first to find the
   disk, then if rq_qos_exit() from del_gendisk() is done before
   rq_qos_add(), then memory will be leaked.

This patch add a new disk level mutex 'rq_qos_mutex':

1) The lock will protect rq_qos_exit() directly.

2) For wbt that doesn't relied on blk-cgroup, rq_qos_add() can only be
   called from disk initialization for now because wbt can't be
   destructed until rq_qos_exit(), so it's safe not to protect wbt for
   now. Hoever, in case that rq_qos dynamically destruction is supported
   in the furture, this patch also protect rq_qos_add() from wbt_init()
   directly, this is enough because blk-sysfs already synchronize
   writers with disk removal.

3) For iocost and iolatency, in order to synchronize disk removal and
   cgroup configuration, the lock is held after blkdev_get_no_open()
   from blkg_conf_open_bdev(), and is released in blkg_conf_exit().
   In order to fix the above memory leak, disk_live() is checked after
   holding the new lock.

Fixes: 50e34d78 ("block: disable the elevator int del_gendisk")
Signed-off-by: default avatarYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Acked-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230414084008.2085155-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 712fd23a
......@@ -748,6 +748,13 @@ int blkg_conf_open_bdev(struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx)
return -ENODEV;
}
mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_queue->rq_qos_mutex);
if (!disk_live(bdev->bd_disk)) {
blkdev_put_no_open(bdev);
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_queue->rq_qos_mutex);
return -ENODEV;
}
ctx->body = input;
ctx->bdev = bdev;
return 0;
......@@ -892,6 +899,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_conf_prep);
*/
void blkg_conf_exit(struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx)
__releases(&ctx->bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock)
__releases(&ctx->bdev->bd_queue->rq_qos_mutex)
{
if (ctx->blkg) {
spin_unlock_irq(&bdev_get_queue(ctx->bdev)->queue_lock);
......@@ -899,6 +907,7 @@ void blkg_conf_exit(struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx)
}
if (ctx->bdev) {
mutex_unlock(&ctx->bdev->bd_queue->rq_qos_mutex);
blkdev_put_no_open(ctx->bdev);
ctx->body = NULL;
ctx->bdev = NULL;
......
......@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(int node_id)
mutex_init(&q->debugfs_mutex);
mutex_init(&q->sysfs_lock);
mutex_init(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);
mutex_init(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
spin_lock_init(&q->queue_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&q->mq_freeze_wq);
......
......@@ -288,11 +288,13 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data,
void rq_qos_exit(struct request_queue *q)
{
mutex_lock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
while (q->rq_qos) {
struct rq_qos *rqos = q->rq_qos;
q->rq_qos = rqos->next;
rqos->ops->exit(rqos);
}
mutex_unlock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
}
int rq_qos_add(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct gendisk *disk, enum rq_qos_id id,
......@@ -300,6 +302,8 @@ int rq_qos_add(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct gendisk *disk, enum rq_qos_id id,
{
struct request_queue *q = disk->queue;
lockdep_assert_held(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
rqos->disk = disk;
rqos->id = id;
rqos->ops = ops;
......@@ -307,18 +311,13 @@ int rq_qos_add(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct gendisk *disk, enum rq_qos_id id,
/*
* No IO can be in-flight when adding rqos, so freeze queue, which
* is fine since we only support rq_qos for blk-mq queue.
*
* Reuse ->queue_lock for protecting against other concurrent
* rq_qos adding/deleting
*/
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
if (rq_qos_id(q, rqos->id))
goto ebusy;
rqos->next = q->rq_qos;
q->rq_qos = rqos;
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
......@@ -330,7 +329,6 @@ int rq_qos_add(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct gendisk *disk, enum rq_qos_id id,
return 0;
ebusy:
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
return -EBUSY;
}
......@@ -340,21 +338,15 @@ void rq_qos_del(struct rq_qos *rqos)
struct request_queue *q = rqos->disk->queue;
struct rq_qos **cur;
/*
* See comment in rq_qos_add() about freezing queue & using
* ->queue_lock.
*/
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
lockdep_assert_held(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
for (cur = &q->rq_qos; *cur; cur = &(*cur)->next) {
if (*cur == rqos) {
*cur = rqos->next;
break;
}
}
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
......
......@@ -942,7 +942,9 @@ int wbt_init(struct gendisk *disk)
/*
* Assign rwb and add the stats callback.
*/
mutex_lock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
ret = rq_qos_add(&rwb->rqos, disk, RQ_QOS_WBT, &wbt_rqos_ops);
mutex_unlock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
if (ret)
goto err_free;
......
......@@ -392,6 +392,7 @@ struct request_queue {
struct blk_queue_stats *stats;
struct rq_qos *rq_qos;
struct mutex rq_qos_mutex;
const struct blk_mq_ops *mq_ops;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment