Commit a2ece1f5 authored by Jason Wang's avatar Jason Wang Committed by Michael Ellerman

powerpc: use strscpy to replace strlcpy

The strlcpy should not be used because it doesn't limit the source
length. As linus says, it's a completely useless function if you
can't implicitly trust the source string - but that is almost always
why people think they should use it! All in all the BSD function
will lead some potential bugs.

But the strscpy doesn't require reading memory from the src string
beyond the specified "count" bytes, and since the return value is
easier to error-check than strlcpy()'s. In addition, the implementation
is robust to the string changing out from underneath it, unlike the
current strlcpy() implementation.

Thus, We prefer using strscpy instead of strlcpy.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210807072154.64512-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com
parent 76c452b4
......@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static void __init bootx_scan_dt_build_strings(unsigned long base,
DBG(" detected display ! adding properties names !\n");
bootx_dt_add_string("linux,boot-display", mem_end);
bootx_dt_add_string("linux,opened", mem_end);
strlcpy(bootx_disp_path, namep, sizeof(bootx_disp_path));
strscpy(bootx_disp_path, namep, sizeof(bootx_disp_path));
}
/* get and store all property names */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment