Commit a4178876 authored by Ming Lei's avatar Ming Lei Committed by Ingo Molnar

lockdep: Remove recursion stattistics

Since lockdep has introduced BFS to avoid recursion, statistics
for recursion does not make any sense now. So remove them.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
LKML-Reference: <1251542879-5211-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 96004bb2
...@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ unsigned int nr_hardirq_chains; ...@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ unsigned int nr_hardirq_chains;
unsigned int nr_softirq_chains; unsigned int nr_softirq_chains;
unsigned int nr_process_chains; unsigned int nr_process_chains;
unsigned int max_lockdep_depth; unsigned int max_lockdep_depth;
unsigned int max_recursion_depth;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
/* /*
...@@ -429,11 +428,8 @@ atomic_t redundant_softirqs_on; ...@@ -429,11 +428,8 @@ atomic_t redundant_softirqs_on;
atomic_t redundant_softirqs_off; atomic_t redundant_softirqs_off;
atomic_t nr_unused_locks; atomic_t nr_unused_locks;
atomic_t nr_cyclic_checks; atomic_t nr_cyclic_checks;
atomic_t nr_cyclic_check_recursions;
atomic_t nr_find_usage_forwards_checks; atomic_t nr_find_usage_forwards_checks;
atomic_t nr_find_usage_forwards_recursions;
atomic_t nr_find_usage_backwards_checks; atomic_t nr_find_usage_backwards_checks;
atomic_t nr_find_usage_backwards_recursions;
#endif #endif
/* /*
......
...@@ -199,16 +199,10 @@ static void lockdep_stats_debug_show(struct seq_file *m) ...@@ -199,16 +199,10 @@ static void lockdep_stats_debug_show(struct seq_file *m)
debug_atomic_read(&chain_lookup_hits)); debug_atomic_read(&chain_lookup_hits));
seq_printf(m, " cyclic checks: %11u\n", seq_printf(m, " cyclic checks: %11u\n",
debug_atomic_read(&nr_cyclic_checks)); debug_atomic_read(&nr_cyclic_checks));
seq_printf(m, " cyclic-check recursions: %11u\n",
debug_atomic_read(&nr_cyclic_check_recursions));
seq_printf(m, " find-mask forwards checks: %11u\n", seq_printf(m, " find-mask forwards checks: %11u\n",
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_forwards_checks)); debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_forwards_checks));
seq_printf(m, " find-mask forwards recursions: %11u\n",
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_forwards_recursions));
seq_printf(m, " find-mask backwards checks: %11u\n", seq_printf(m, " find-mask backwards checks: %11u\n",
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_backwards_checks)); debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_backwards_checks));
seq_printf(m, " find-mask backwards recursions:%11u\n",
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_backwards_recursions));
seq_printf(m, " hardirq on events: %11u\n", hi1); seq_printf(m, " hardirq on events: %11u\n", hi1);
seq_printf(m, " hardirq off events: %11u\n", hi2); seq_printf(m, " hardirq off events: %11u\n", hi2);
...@@ -350,8 +344,6 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) ...@@ -350,8 +344,6 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
nr_unused); nr_unused);
seq_printf(m, " max locking depth: %11u\n", seq_printf(m, " max locking depth: %11u\n",
max_lockdep_depth); max_lockdep_depth);
seq_printf(m, " max recursion depth: %11u\n",
max_recursion_depth);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
seq_printf(m, " max bfs queue depth: %11u\n", seq_printf(m, " max bfs queue depth: %11u\n",
max_bfs_queue_depth); max_bfs_queue_depth);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment