Commit a5397d68 authored by Mark Bloch's avatar Mark Bloch Committed by Jakub Kicinski

net/sched: cls_api, reset flags on replay

tc_new_tfilter() can replay a request if it got EAGAIN. The cited commit
didn't account for this when it converted TC action ->init() API
to use flags instead of parameters. This can lead to passing stale flags
down the call chain which results in trying to lock rtnl when it's
already locked, deadlocking the entire system.

Fix by making sure to reset flags on each replay.

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.14.0-rc3-custom-49011-g3d2bbb4f104d #447 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
tc/37605 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff841df2f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: tc_setup_cb_add+0x14b/0x4d0

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff841df2f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: tc_new_tfilter+0xb12/0x22e0

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(rtnl_mutex);
  lock(rtnl_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***
 May be due to missing lock nesting notation
1 lock held by tc/37605:
 #0: ffffffff841df2f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: tc_new_tfilter+0xb12/0x22e0

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 37605 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.14.0-rc3-custom-49011-g3d2bbb4f104d #447
Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2010/SA002610, BIOS 5.6.5 08/24/2017
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x8b/0xb3
 __lock_acquire.cold+0x175/0x3cb
 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x4f0
 __mutex_lock+0x136/0x10d0
 fl_hw_replace_filter+0x458/0x630 [cls_flower]
 fl_change+0x25f2/0x4a64 [cls_flower]
 tc_new_tfilter+0xa65/0x22e0
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x86c/0xc60
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x14d/0x430
 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7e0
 netlink_sendmsg+0x84d/0xd80
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x7ff/0x970
 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf8/0x170
 __sys_sendmsg+0xea/0x1b0
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f7b93b6c0a7
Code: 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48>
RSP: 002b:00007ffe365b3818 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f7b93b6c0a7
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe365b3880 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00000000610a75f6 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: fffffffffffff3a9 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffe365b7b58 R15: 00000000004822c0

Fixes: 695176bf ("net_sched: refactor TC action init API")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210810034305.63997-1-mbloch@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent ebd0d30c
...@@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@ static int tc_new_tfilter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n, ...@@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@ static int tc_new_tfilter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
int err; int err;
int tp_created; int tp_created;
bool rtnl_held = false; bool rtnl_held = false;
u32 flags = 0; u32 flags;
if (!netlink_ns_capable(skb, net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) if (!netlink_ns_capable(skb, net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM; return -EPERM;
...@@ -1970,6 +1970,7 @@ static int tc_new_tfilter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n, ...@@ -1970,6 +1970,7 @@ static int tc_new_tfilter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
tp = NULL; tp = NULL;
cl = 0; cl = 0;
block = NULL; block = NULL;
flags = 0;
if (prio == 0) { if (prio == 0) {
/* If no priority is provided by the user, /* If no priority is provided by the user,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment