Commit a85f2228 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915/gem: Drop forced struct_mutex from shrinker_taints_mutex

Since we no longer always take struct_mutex around everything, and want
the freedom to create GEM objects, actually taking struct_mutex inside
the lock creation ends up pulling the mutex inside other looks. Since we
don't use generally use struct_mutex, we can relax the tainting.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200702083225.20044-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent db833785
......@@ -408,26 +408,15 @@ void i915_gem_driver_unregister__shrinker(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
void i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
struct mutex *mutex)
{
bool unlock = false;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
return;
if (!lockdep_is_held_type(&i915->drm.struct_mutex, -1)) {
mutex_acquire(&i915->drm.struct_mutex.dep_map,
I915_MM_NORMAL, 0, _RET_IP_);
unlock = true;
}
fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
mutex_acquire(&mutex->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
mutex_release(&mutex->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlock)
mutex_release(&i915->drm.struct_mutex.dep_map, _RET_IP_);
}
#define obj_to_i915(obj__) to_i915((obj__)->base.dev)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment