Commit a86caa9b authored by Christian Lamparter's avatar Christian Lamparter Committed by Linus Walleij

pinctrl: msm: fix gpio-hog related boot issues

Sven Eckelmann reported an issue with the current IPQ4019 pinctrl.
Setting up any gpio-hog in the device-tree for his device would
"kill the bootup completely":

| [    0.477838] msm_serial 78af000.serial: could not find pctldev for node /soc/pinctrl@1000000/serial_pinmux, deferring probe
| [    0.499828] spi_qup 78b5000.spi: could not find pctldev for node /soc/pinctrl@1000000/spi_0_pinmux, deferring probe
| [    1.298883] requesting hog GPIO enable USB2 power (chip 1000000.pinctrl, offset 58) failed, -517
| [    1.299609] gpiochip_add_data: GPIOs 0..99 (1000000.pinctrl) failed to register
| [    1.308589] ipq4019-pinctrl 1000000.pinctrl: Failed register gpiochip
| [    1.316586] msm_serial 78af000.serial: could not find pctldev for node /soc/pinctrl@1000000/serial_pinmux, deferring probe
| [    1.322415] spi_qup 78b5000.spi: could not find pctldev for node /soc/pinctrl@1000000/spi_0_pinmux, deferri

This was also verified on a RT-AC58U (IPQ4018) which would
no longer boot, if a gpio-hog was specified. (Tried forcing
the USB LED PIN (GPIO0) to high.).

The problem is that Pinctrl+GPIO registration is currently
peformed in the following order in pinctrl-msm.c:
	1. pinctrl_register()
	2. gpiochip_add()
	3. gpiochip_add_pin_range()

The actual error code -517 == -EPROBE_DEFER is coming from
pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range(), which is called through:
        gpiochip_add
            of_gpiochip_add
                of_gpiochip_scan_gpios
                    gpiod_hog
                        gpiochip_request_own_desc
                            __gpiod_request
                                chip->request
                                    gpiochip_generic_request
                                       pinctrl_gpio_request
                                          pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range

pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range() is unable to find any valid
pin ranges, since nothing has been added to the pinctrldev_list yet.
so the range can't be found, and the operation fails with -EPROBE_DEFER.

This patch fixes the issue by adding the "gpio-ranges" property to
the pinctrl device node of all upstream Qcom SoC. The pin ranges are
then added by the gpio core.

In order to remain compatible with older, existing DTs (and ACPI)
a check for the "gpio-ranges" property has been added to
msm_gpio_init(). This prevents the driver of adding the same entry
to the pinctrldev_list twice.
Reported-by: default avatarSven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@openmesh.com>
Tested-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@openmesh.com> [ipq4019]
Reviewed-by: default avatarBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
parent 21432a8d
...@@ -901,11 +901,24 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl) ...@@ -901,11 +901,24 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl)
return ret; return ret;
} }
ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip, dev_name(pctrl->dev), 0, 0, chip->ngpio); /*
if (ret) { * For DeviceTree-supported systems, the gpio core checks the
dev_err(pctrl->dev, "Failed to add pin range\n"); * pinctrl's device node for the "gpio-ranges" property.
gpiochip_remove(&pctrl->chip); * If it is present, it takes care of adding the pin ranges
return ret; * for the driver. In this case the driver can skip ahead.
*
* In order to remain compatible with older, existing DeviceTree
* files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that
* utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range().
*/
if (!of_property_read_bool(pctrl->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip,
dev_name(pctrl->dev), 0, 0, chip->ngpio);
if (ret) {
dev_err(pctrl->dev, "Failed to add pin range\n");
gpiochip_remove(&pctrl->chip);
return ret;
}
} }
ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(chip, ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(chip,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment