Commit a88d9db9 authored by Vikram Auradkar's avatar Vikram Auradkar Committed by Martin K. Petersen

scsi: pm80xx: Fix dereferencing dangling pointer

sas_task structure should not be used after task_done is called.  If the
device is gone or not attached, we call task_done on t and continue to use
in the sas_task in rest of the function. task_done is pointing to
sas_ata_task_done, may free the memory associated with the task before
returning.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191114100910.6153-8-deepak.ukey@microchip.comAcked-by: default avatarJack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVikram Auradkar <auradkar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDeepak Ukey <deepak.ukey@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarViswas G <Viswas.G@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent e90e2362
...@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task, ...@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task,
struct pm8001_ccb_info *ccb; struct pm8001_ccb_info *ccb;
u32 tag = 0xdeadbeef, rc = 0, n_elem = 0; u32 tag = 0xdeadbeef, rc = 0, n_elem = 0;
unsigned long flags = 0; unsigned long flags = 0;
enum sas_protocol task_proto = t->task_proto;
if (!dev->port) { if (!dev->port) {
struct task_status_struct *tsm = &t->task_status; struct task_status_struct *tsm = &t->task_status;
...@@ -412,7 +413,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task, ...@@ -412,7 +413,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task,
pm8001_dev = dev->lldd_dev; pm8001_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
port = &pm8001_ha->port[sas_find_local_port_id(dev)]; port = &pm8001_ha->port[sas_find_local_port_id(dev)];
if (DEV_IS_GONE(pm8001_dev) || !port->port_attached) { if (DEV_IS_GONE(pm8001_dev) || !port->port_attached) {
if (sas_protocol_ata(t->task_proto)) { if (sas_protocol_ata(task_proto)) {
struct task_status_struct *ts = &t->task_status; struct task_status_struct *ts = &t->task_status;
ts->resp = SAS_TASK_UNDELIVERED; ts->resp = SAS_TASK_UNDELIVERED;
ts->stat = SAS_PHY_DOWN; ts->stat = SAS_PHY_DOWN;
...@@ -434,7 +435,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task, ...@@ -434,7 +435,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task,
goto err_out; goto err_out;
ccb = &pm8001_ha->ccb_info[tag]; ccb = &pm8001_ha->ccb_info[tag];
if (!sas_protocol_ata(t->task_proto)) { if (!sas_protocol_ata(task_proto)) {
if (t->num_scatter) { if (t->num_scatter) {
n_elem = dma_map_sg(pm8001_ha->dev, n_elem = dma_map_sg(pm8001_ha->dev,
t->scatter, t->scatter,
...@@ -454,7 +455,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task, ...@@ -454,7 +455,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task,
ccb->ccb_tag = tag; ccb->ccb_tag = tag;
ccb->task = t; ccb->task = t;
ccb->device = pm8001_dev; ccb->device = pm8001_dev;
switch (t->task_proto) { switch (task_proto) {
case SAS_PROTOCOL_SMP: case SAS_PROTOCOL_SMP:
rc = pm8001_task_prep_smp(pm8001_ha, ccb); rc = pm8001_task_prep_smp(pm8001_ha, ccb);
break; break;
...@@ -471,8 +472,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task, ...@@ -471,8 +472,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task,
break; break;
default: default:
dev_printk(KERN_ERR, pm8001_ha->dev, dev_printk(KERN_ERR, pm8001_ha->dev,
"unknown sas_task proto: 0x%x\n", "unknown sas_task proto: 0x%x\n", task_proto);
t->task_proto);
rc = -EINVAL; rc = -EINVAL;
break; break;
} }
...@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task, ...@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int pm8001_task_exec(struct sas_task *task,
pm8001_tag_free(pm8001_ha, tag); pm8001_tag_free(pm8001_ha, tag);
err_out: err_out:
dev_printk(KERN_ERR, pm8001_ha->dev, "pm8001 exec failed[%d]!\n", rc); dev_printk(KERN_ERR, pm8001_ha->dev, "pm8001 exec failed[%d]!\n", rc);
if (!sas_protocol_ata(t->task_proto)) if (!sas_protocol_ata(task_proto))
if (n_elem) if (n_elem)
dma_unmap_sg(pm8001_ha->dev, t->scatter, t->num_scatter, dma_unmap_sg(pm8001_ha->dev, t->scatter, t->num_scatter,
t->data_dir); t->data_dir);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment