blk-mq: sync the update nr_hw_queues with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881356 commit f5bbbbe4 upstream. For blk-mq, part_in_flight/rw will invoke blk_mq_in_flight/rw to account the inflight requests. It will access the queue_hw_ctx and nr_hw_queues w/o any protection. When updating nr_hw_queues and blk_mq_in_flight/rw occur concurrently, panic comes up. Before update nr_hw_queues, the q will be frozen. So we could use q_usage_counter to avoid the race. percpu_ref_is_zero is used here so that we will not miss any in-flight request. The access to nr_hw_queues and queue_hw_ctx in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter are under rcu critical section, __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues could use synchronize_rcu to ensure the zeroed q_usage_counter to be globally visible. -------------- NOTE: Back-ported to 4.4.y. The upstream commit was intended to prevent concurrent manipulation of nr_hw_queues and iteration over queues. The former doesn't happen in this in 4.4.7 (as __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues doesn't exist). The extra locking is also buggy in this commit but fixed in a follow-up. It may protect against other concurrent accesses such as queue removal by synchronising RCU locking around q_usage_counter. -------------- Signed-off-by:Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by:
Giuliano Procida <gprocida@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Ian May <ian.may@canonical.com> Signed-off-by:
Kelsey Skunberg <kelsey.skunberg@canonical.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment