Commit ac5da544 authored by Jianbo Liu's avatar Jianbo Liu Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5e: TC, Fix internal port memory leak

The flow rule can be splited, and the extra post_act rules are added
to post_act table. It's possible to trigger memleak when the rule
forwards packets from internal port and over tunnel, in the case that,
for example, CT 'new' state offload is allowed. As int_port object is
assigned to the flow attribute of post_act rule, and its refcnt is
incremented by mlx5e_tc_int_port_get(), but mlx5e_tc_int_port_put() is
not called, the refcnt is never decremented, then int_port is never
freed.

The kmemleak reports the following error:
unreferenced object 0xffff888128204b80 (size 64):
  comm "handler20", pid 50121, jiffies 4296973009 (age 642.932s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    01 00 00 00 19 00 00 00 03 f0 00 00 04 00 00 00  ................
    98 77 67 41 81 88 ff ff 98 77 67 41 81 88 ff ff  .wgA.....wgA....
  backtrace:
    [<00000000e992680d>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0x120
    [<000000009e945a98>] mlx5e_tc_int_port_get+0x3f3/0xe20 [mlx5_core]
    [<0000000035a537f0>] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x473/0xcf0 [mlx5_core]
    [<0000000070c2cec6>] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x7cf/0xe90 [mlx5_core]
    [<000000005cc84048>] mlx5e_configure_flower+0xd40/0x4c40 [mlx5_core]
    [<000000004f8a2031>] mlx5e_rep_indr_offload.isra.0+0x10e/0x1c0 [mlx5_core]
    [<000000007df797dc>] mlx5e_rep_indr_setup_tc_cb+0x90/0x130 [mlx5_core]
    [<0000000016c15cc3>] tc_setup_cb_add+0x1cf/0x410
    [<00000000a63305b4>] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x38f/0x670 [cls_flower]
    [<000000008bc9e77c>] fl_change+0x1fd5/0x4430 [cls_flower]
    [<00000000e7f766e4>] tc_new_tfilter+0x867/0x2010
    [<00000000e101c0ef>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x6fc/0x9f0
    [<00000000e1111d44>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x12c/0x360
    [<0000000082dd6c8b>] netlink_unicast+0x438/0x710
    [<00000000fc568f70>] netlink_sendmsg+0x794/0xc50
    [<0000000016e92590>] sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190

So fix this by moving int_port cleanup code to the flow attribute
free helper, which is used by all the attribute free cases.

Fixes: 8300f225 ("net/mlx5e: Create new flow attr for multi table actions")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
parent 72cc6549
......@@ -1943,9 +1943,7 @@ static void mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
{
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
struct mlx5_flow_attr *attr = flow->attr;
struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *esw_attr;
esw_attr = attr->esw_attr;
mlx5e_put_flow_tunnel_id(flow);
remove_unready_flow(flow);
......@@ -1966,12 +1964,6 @@ static void mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
mlx5_tc_ct_match_del(get_ct_priv(priv), &flow->attr->ct_attr);
if (esw_attr->int_port)
mlx5e_tc_int_port_put(mlx5e_get_int_port_priv(priv), esw_attr->int_port);
if (esw_attr->dest_int_port)
mlx5e_tc_int_port_put(mlx5e_get_int_port_priv(priv), esw_attr->dest_int_port);
if (flow_flag_test(flow, L3_TO_L2_DECAP))
mlx5e_detach_decap(priv, flow);
......@@ -4268,6 +4260,7 @@ static void
mlx5_free_flow_attr_actions(struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow, struct mlx5_flow_attr *attr)
{
struct mlx5_core_dev *counter_dev = get_flow_counter_dev(flow);
struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *esw_attr;
if (!attr)
return;
......@@ -4285,6 +4278,18 @@ mlx5_free_flow_attr_actions(struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow, struct mlx5_flow_attr *a
mlx5e_tc_detach_mod_hdr(flow->priv, flow, attr);
}
if (mlx5e_is_eswitch_flow(flow)) {
esw_attr = attr->esw_attr;
if (esw_attr->int_port)
mlx5e_tc_int_port_put(mlx5e_get_int_port_priv(flow->priv),
esw_attr->int_port);
if (esw_attr->dest_int_port)
mlx5e_tc_int_port_put(mlx5e_get_int_port_priv(flow->priv),
esw_attr->dest_int_port);
}
mlx5_tc_ct_delete_flow(get_ct_priv(flow->priv), attr);
free_branch_attr(flow, attr->branch_true);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment