Commit ada609ee authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

workqueue: use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM instead of WQ_RESCUER

WQ_RESCUER is now an internal flag and should only be used in the
workqueue implementation proper.  Use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM instead.

This doesn't introduce any functional difference.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
parent c723fdab
......@@ -7321,7 +7321,7 @@ static int __init md_init(void)
{
int ret = -ENOMEM;
md_wq = alloc_workqueue("md", WQ_RESCUER, 0);
md_wq = alloc_workqueue("md", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
if (!md_wq)
goto err_wq;
......
......@@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ static int nfsiod_start(void)
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
dprintk("RPC: creating workqueue nfsiod\n");
wq = alloc_workqueue("nfsiod", WQ_RESCUER, 0);
wq = alloc_workqueue("nfsiod", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
if (wq == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
nfsiod_workqueue = wq;
......
......@@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ static int rpciod_start(void)
* Create the rpciod thread and wait for it to start.
*/
dprintk("RPC: creating workqueue rpciod\n");
wq = alloc_workqueue("rpciod", WQ_RESCUER, 0);
wq = alloc_workqueue("rpciod", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
rpciod_workqueue = wq;
return rpciod_workqueue != NULL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment