Commit aeeb59d6 authored by Dmitry Safonov's avatar Dmitry Safonov Committed by Linus Torvalds

csky: add show_stack_loglvl()

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization.  It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side.  In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.  And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers.  Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.

Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by: default avatarDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-13-dima@arista.comSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent a1eea2ef
......@@ -91,14 +91,21 @@ static void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task,
static bool print_trace_address(unsigned long pc, void *arg)
{
print_ip_sym(pc);
print_ip_sym((const char *)arg, pc);
return false;
}
void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp,
const char *loglvl)
{
pr_cont("Call Trace:\n");
walk_stackframe(task, NULL, print_trace_address, (void *)loglvl);
}
void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
{
pr_cont("Call Trace:\n");
walk_stackframe(task, NULL, print_trace_address, NULL);
walk_stackframe(task, NULL, print_trace_address, KERN_INFO);
}
static bool save_wchan(unsigned long pc, void *arg)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment