Commit b05fdc46 authored by Zong-Zhe Yang's avatar Zong-Zhe Yang Committed by Kalle Valo

wifi: rtw89: refine rtw89_correct_cck_chan() by rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band()

In rtw89_correct_cck_chan(), we turn to use rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band().
The difference between rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band() and the original raw
judgement is the case on 6 GHz. Since rtw89_correct_cck_chan() is common
code independent on chip, if runtime chip doesn't support 6 GHz, it is
probably safe. Otherwise, it might not.
Signed-off-by: default avatarZong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPing-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230816082133.57474-3-pkshih@realtek.com
parent 64a24cb6
......@@ -1659,8 +1659,7 @@ static void rtw89_correct_cck_chan(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
const struct rtw89_chan_rcd *rcd =
rtw89_chan_rcd_get(rtwdev, RTW89_SUB_ENTITY_0);
u16 chan = rcd->prev_primary_channel;
u8 band = rcd->prev_band_type == RTW89_BAND_2G ?
NL80211_BAND_2GHZ : NL80211_BAND_5GHZ;
u8 band = rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band(rcd->prev_band_type);
if (status->band != NL80211_BAND_2GHZ &&
status->encoding == RX_ENC_LEGACY &&
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment