Commit b0dc2b9b authored by Mel Gorman's avatar Mel Gorman Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single node machines

NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of
num_online_nodes (online nodes).

The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1 or higher
will enable NUMA balancing.  This will incur useless overhead due to
minor faults with the impact depending on the workload.  These are the
impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
whose node ID happened to be 1:

  			       vanilla     patched
  NUMA base PTE updates          5113158           0
  NUMA huge PMD updates              643           0
  NUMA page range updates        5442374           0
  NUMA hint faults               2109622           0
  NUMA hint local faults         2109622           0
  NUMA hint local percent            100         100
  NUMA pages migrated                  0           0
Signed-off-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.8+]
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent b7701755
...@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void) ...@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void)
if (numabalancing_override) if (numabalancing_override)
set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1); set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
if (nr_node_ids > 1 && !numabalancing_override) { if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. " pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. "
"Configure with numa_balancing= or the " "Configure with numa_balancing= or the "
"kernel.numa_balancing sysctl", "kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment